Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 48562/06   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2012,55306
EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 48562/06 (https://dejure.org/2012,55306)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27.11.2012 - 48562/06 (https://dejure.org/2012,55306)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27. November 2012 - 48562/06 (https://dejure.org/2012,55306)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55306) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

  • EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 62208/00

    LABZOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 48562/06
    The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see, among other authorities, Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-X; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, §§ 39 et seq., 20 January 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, §§ 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, §§ 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, §§ 75 et seq., 1 March 2007; and Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 166).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 48562/06
    Although measures depriving a person of liberty may often involve such an element, in accordance with Article 3 of the Convention the State must ensure that a person is detained under conditions which are compatible with respect for his human dignity and that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him to distress or hardship exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05

    MAMEDOVA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 48562/06
    The Court takes cognisance of the fact that in the present case there is no indication that there was a positive intention on the part of the authorities to humiliate or debase the applicant but reiterates that, irrespective of the reasons for the overcrowding, it is incumbent on the respondent Government to organise their custodial system in such a way as to ensure respect for the dignity of detainees, regardless of financial or logistical difficulties (see Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 63, 1 June 2006, and Benediktov v. Russia, no. 106/02, § 37, 10 May 2007).
  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

    ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 48562/06
    Accordingly, the Court dismisses the Government's objection as to the non-exhaustion of domestic remedies (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 100-19, 10 January 2012) in respect of this part of the application.
  • EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 30138/02

    NURMAGOMEDOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 48562/06
    Admittedly, as regards the applicant's detention in the correctional facility, the Court has previously held that the personal space afforded to the detainees in the dormitory of a correctional facility must be viewed in the context of the wide freedom of movement enjoyed by detainees during the daytime, which ensures that they have unobstructed access to natural light and air (see Nurmagomedov v. Russia (dec.), no. 30138/02, 16 September 2004).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 48562/06
    The Convention prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances or the victim's behaviour (see, among other authorities, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 20.01.2005 - 63378/00

    MAYZIT v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 48562/06
    The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see, among other authorities, Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-X; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, §§ 39 et seq., 20 January 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, §§ 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, §§ 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, §§ 75 et seq., 1 March 2007; and Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 166).
  • EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 29652/04

    ORLOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 48562/06
    Nor have they demonstrated that if the applicant had complained to the authorities about his detention, this would have substantiated his allegation of a criminal offence attributable to a public official and thus have required, in the context of Article 3 of the Convention, a criminal investigation (see Orlov v. Russia, no. 29652/04, § 64, 21 June 2011).
  • EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

    KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 48562/06
    The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see, among other authorities, Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-X; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, §§ 39 et seq., 20 January 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, §§ 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, §§ 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, §§ 75 et seq., 1 March 2007; and Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 166).
  • EGMR, 02.06.2005 - 66460/01

    NOVOSELOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 48562/06
    The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see, among other authorities, Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-X; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, §§ 39 et seq., 20 January 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, §§ 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, §§ 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, §§ 75 et seq., 1 March 2007; and Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 166).
  • EGMR, 01.03.2007 - 72967/01

    BELEVITSKIY v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 106/02

    BENEDIKTOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

    Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention,

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht