Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 19882/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,23113) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
GIORGI MAZANASHVILI v. GEORGIA
Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 11602/02
SPÓLKA Z O.O. WAZA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 19882/07
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI); WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 19882/07
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI); WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 35485/05
HUSEYN AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 19882/07
The Court has also clearly established its practice on the various aspects of fair-trial guarantees relied on by the applicant in his complaints under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention (see, for instance, Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118-147, ECHR 2011; Huseyn and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 35485/05, 45553/05, 35680/05 and 36085/05, §§ 196-213, 26 July 2011; and Lisica v. Croatia, no. 20100/06, §§ 47-62, 25 February 2010).
- EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 47729/08
GOGINASHVILI v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 19882/07
In this regard, it reiterates that there already exists well-established case-law on the issue of the lack of adequate medical treatment in prison (see, for instance, Goginashvili v. Georgia, no. 47729/08, §§ 71-81, 4 October 2011; Jeladze v. Georgia, no. 1871/08, §§ 43-50, 18 December 2012; and Jashi v. Georgia, no. 10799/06, §§ 63-66, 8 January 2013). - EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 46055/06
TAKTAKISHVILI v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 19882/07
The Court also reiterates that, in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application or part of an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government, even if the applicant wishes the examination of the case to be continued (see Taktakishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 46055/06, 16 October 2012, and Beridze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 16206/06, 30 April 2013). - EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 1871/08
JELADZE v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 19882/07
In this regard, it reiterates that there already exists well-established case-law on the issue of the lack of adequate medical treatment in prison (see, for instance, Goginashvili v. Georgia, no. 47729/08, §§ 71-81, 4 October 2011; Jeladze v. Georgia, no. 1871/08, §§ 43-50, 18 December 2012; and Jashi v. Georgia, no. 10799/06, §§ 63-66, 8 January 2013). - EGMR, 30.04.2013 - 16206/06
BERIDZE v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 19882/07
The Court also reiterates that, in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application or part of an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government, even if the applicant wishes the examination of the case to be continued (see Taktakishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 46055/06, 16 October 2012, and Beridze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 16206/06, 30 April 2013).
- EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 71672/10
MAMULASHVILI v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 04.09.2014 - 46780/07
KASRADZEEBI v. GEORGIA