Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  T.M. AND C.M. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Art. 3, Art. 14, Art. 14+3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 14+3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  T.M. and C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (18)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 26608/11

  The Court reiterates that ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum is relative: it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the nature and context of the treatment, its duration, its physical and mental effects and, in some instances, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 30, Series A no. 247-C, and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 32704/04

  DENIS VASILYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 26608/11

  Furthermore, Article 3 requires that the authorities conduct an effective official investigation into the alleged ill-treatment, even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 151, ECHR 2003-XII, and Denis Vasilyev v. Russia, no. 32704/04, §§ 98-99, 17 December 2009).
• EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

  Opuz ./. Türkei

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 26608/11

  It further reiterates that Article 1 of the Convention, taken in conjunction with Article 3, imposes on the States positive obligations to ensure that individuals within their jurisdiction are protected against all forms of ill-treatment prohibited under Article 3, including where such treatment is administered by private individuals (see A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, § 22, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VI, and Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 159, ECHR 2009).

 
• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

  M.C. c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 26608/11

  Furthermore, Article 3 requires that the authorities conduct an effective official investigation into the alleged ill-treatment, even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 151, ECHR 2003-XII, and Denis Vasilyev v. Russia, no. 32704/04, §§ 98-99, 17 December 2009).
• EGMR, 04.03.2008 - 42722/02

  STOICA v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 26608/11

  Consideration has been given to the opening of investigations, delays in taking statements and to the length of time taken for the initial investigation (see Denis Vasilyev, cited above, § 100 with further references, and Stoica v. Romania, no. 42722/02, § 67, 4 March 2008).
• EGMR, 25.03.1993 - 13134/87

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 26608/11

  The Court reiterates that ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum is relative: it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the nature and context of the treatment, its duration, its physical and mental effects and, in some instances, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 30, Series A no. 247-C, and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI).

• EGMR, 02.03.2017 - 41237/14

  Italien muss Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt entschädigen

  Se référant à la conclusion de la Cour sous l'angle de l'article 14 de la Convention combiné avec l'article 3 dans l'affaire T.M. et C.M. c. République de Moldova (no 26608/11, § 49 et § 62, 28 janvier 2014), la requérante demande à la Cour de conclure à la violation de l'article 14.

  (T.M. et C.M. c. République de Moldova, no 26608/11, § 62, 28 janvier 2014 ; Eremia, précité, § 98, et Mudric c. République de Moldova, no 74839/10, § 63, 16 juillet 2013).

  (see Eremia v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 3564/11, § 89, 28 May 2013), Mudric v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 74839/10, § 63, 16 July 2013 and T.M. and C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 26608/11, § 62, 7 January 2014; my emphasis)".

• EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 62903/15

  KURT v. AUSTRIA

  La Cour a reconnu que, étant donné l'état psychologique singulier dans lequel les victimes de violences domestiques se trouvent, les autorités chargées de l'affaire sont tenues de poser des questions pertinentes aux fins de recueillir toutes les informations importantes au lieu d'escompter simplement que la victime livrera d'elle-même tous les détails présentant un intérêt (paragraphe 170 de l'arrêt et T.M. et C.M. c. République de Moldova, no 26608/11, § 46, 28 janvier 2014).
• EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 18179/17

  KARTER v. UKRAINE

  Article 3 of the Convention requires that the authorities conduct an effective official investigation into alleged ill-treatment, even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see T.M. and C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 26608/11, § 38, 28 January 2014).

 
• EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 73235/12

  IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  This obligation should include effective protection of, inter alia, an identified individual or individuals from the criminal acts of a third party, as well as reasonable steps to prevent ill-treatment of which the authorities knew or ought to have known (see, for instance, T.M. and C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 26608/11, § 38, 28 January 2014).
• EGMR, 17.10.2023 - 55351/17

  LUCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  The Court notes that the phenomenon of domestic violence is not regarded as being limited to the sole fact of physical violence but is considered to include, among other aspects, psychological violence and stalking (see Buturuga v. Romania, no. 56867/15, § 74, 11 February 2020), threats (see Tunikova and Others, cited above, § 119) and fear of further assaults (see Eremia v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 3564/11, § 54, 28 May 2013; T.M. and C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 26608/11, § 41, 28 January 2014; and Volodina, cited above, § 75).

  The State's obligation to investigate will not be satisfied if the protection afforded by domestic law exists only in theory; above all, it must also operate effectively in practice, and that requires a prompt examination of the case without unnecessary delays (see Opuz, cited above, §§ 145-51 and 168; T.M. and C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 26608/11, § 46, 28 January 2014; and Talpis v. Italy, no. 41237/14, §§ 106 and 129, 2 March 2017).

• EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 56867/15

  BUTURUGA c. ROUMANIE

  La Cour note que, tant en droit interne qu'en droit international, le phénomène de la violence domestique n'est pas perçu comme étant limité aux seuls faits de violence physique mais qu'il inclut, entre autres, la violence psychologique ou le harcèlement (paragraphes 33 et 34-42 ci-dessus ; voir, mutatis mutandis, T.M. et C.M. c. République de Moldova, no 26608/11, § 47, 28 janvier 2014).
• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 55974/16

  TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Fear of further assaults can be sufficiently serious to cause victims of domestic violence to experience suffering and anxiety capable of attaining the minimum threshold of application of Article 3 (see Eremia v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 3564/11, § 54, 28 May 2013; T.M. and C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 26608/11, § 41, 28 January 2014; and Volodina, cited above, § 75).
• EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 32715/19

  M.S. c. ITALIE

  La crainte de nouvelles agressions peut être suffisamment grave pour que les victimes de violences domestiques éprouvent une souffrance et une angoisse susceptibles d'atteindre le seuil minimal d'application de l'article 3 (Eremia c. République de Moldova, no 3564/11, § 54, 28 mai 2013, T.M. et C.M. c. République de Moldova, no 26608/11, § 41, 28 janvier 2014, et Volodina, précité, § 75).
• EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 48475/09

  SAKIR c. GRÈCE

  S'agissant de la situation d'un individu qui se plaint de mauvais traitements infligés par des particuliers, comme en l'espèce, et non pas par des fonctionnaires de l'État défendeur lui-même, la Cour se réfère aux principes généraux qui se dégagent de sa jurisprudence, notamment dans les affaires Membres de la Congrégation des témoins de Jéhovah de Gldani et autres c. Géorgie (no 71156/01, §§ 96-97, 3 mai 2007), Secic, (précité, § 52), Denis Vasilyev c. Russie (no 32704/04, §§ 98-99, 17 décembre 2009), T.M. et C.M. c. République de Moldova (no 26608/11, §§ 35-39, 28 janvier 2014), et Ibrahim Demirtas c. Turquie (no 25018/10, §§ 25-29, 28 octobre 2014).
• EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 58358/14

  ROMANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Article 3 of the Convention requires that the authorities conduct an effective official investigation into alleged ill-treatment, even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see T.M. and C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 26608/11, § 38, 28 January 2014).
• EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 19355/09

  FILIPPOVY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 16.12.2021 - 73204/13

  WOMEN'S INITIATIVES SUPPORTING GROUP AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 23914/15

  GENDERDOC-M AND M.D. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 28.04.2015 - 49742/09

  BASTÜRK c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 16.06.2022 - 23735/19

  DE GIORGI c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 08.09.2022 - 35898/16

  J.I. v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 20289/10

  BARSOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.06.2023 - 38650/18

  GAIDUKEVICH v. GEORGIA