Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 31442/08   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2014,22695
EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 31442/08 (https://dejure.org/2014,22695)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 28.01.2014 - 31442/08 (https://dejure.org/2014,22695)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 28. Januar 2014 - 31442/08 (https://dejure.org/2014,22695)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,22695) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

    ZHELNOV v. RUSSIA

    Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 13, Art. 17, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 2 MRK
    [ENG]

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 40016/98

    KARNER c. AUTRICHE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 31442/08
    Following its established practice in similar circumstances (see Scherer v. Switzerland, 25 March 1994, § 31, Series A no. 287; Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 23, ECHR 2003-IX; and Thevenon v. France (dec.), no. 2476/02, ECHR 2006-III), the Court considers that the present application should be struck out of its list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 of the Convention.
  • EGMR, 28.02.2006 - 2476/02

    THÉVENON c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 31442/08
    Following its established practice in similar circumstances (see Scherer v. Switzerland, 25 March 1994, § 31, Series A no. 287; Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 23, ECHR 2003-IX; and Thevenon v. France (dec.), no. 2476/02, ECHR 2006-III), the Court considers that the present application should be struck out of its list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 of the Convention.
  • EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

    DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 31442/08
    The Court notes that in a number of cases in which an applicant died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or of close family members expressing the wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see, for example, Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 37, Series A no. 35; Vocaturo v. Italy, 24 May 1991, § 2, Series A no. 206-C; Pandolfelli and Palumbo v. Italy, 27 February 1994, § 2, Series A no. 231-B; Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII; and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI).
  • EGMR, 25.03.1994 - 17116/90

    SCHERER v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 31442/08
    Following its established practice in similar circumstances (see Scherer v. Switzerland, 25 March 1994, § 31, Series A no. 287; Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 23, ECHR 2003-IX; and Thevenon v. France (dec.), no. 2476/02, ECHR 2006-III), the Court considers that the present application should be struck out of its list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 of the Convention.
  • EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95

    DALBAN v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 31442/08
    The Court notes that in a number of cases in which an applicant died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or of close family members expressing the wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see, for example, Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 37, Series A no. 35; Vocaturo v. Italy, 24 May 1991, § 2, Series A no. 206-C; Pandolfelli and Palumbo v. Italy, 27 February 1994, § 2, Series A no. 231-B; Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII; and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht