Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TREIAL v. ESTONIA

  Art. 6, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 64536/01

  IAMBOR c. ROUMANIE (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 32897/12

  Therefore, and in order to allow the domestic judicial authorities to further develop the available remedies, the Court considers that the domestic courts should have been given an opportunity to rule on a case like the present one before it was brought to Strasbourg (compare Demir, cited above, § 32, with further reference to Iambor v. Romania (no. 1), no. 64536/01, § 221, 24 June 2008).
• EGMR, 28.03.2013 - 10195/08

  KOROBOV AND OTHERS v. ESTONIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 32897/12

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that if doubt exists as to the effectiveness of a domestic remedy, an attempt to use that remedy must be made (see, for example, Korobov and Others v. Estonia, no. 10195/08, § 137, 28 March 2013, with further references).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 32897/12

  The Court reiterates that the purpose of the exhaustion rule set out in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, among other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V).

 
• EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 51770/07

  DEMIR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 32897/12

  Thus, the Court has found that a newly established remedy in respect of length-of-proceedings complaints had to be exhausted, regardless of the lack of pertinent case-law (see Nogolica v. Croatia (dec.), no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII); a similar conclusion has been made, for example, in respect of a complaint concerning excessive length of pre-trial detention (see Demir v. Turkey (dec.), no. 51770/07, § 31, 16 October 2012).
• EGMR, 15.05.2007 - 463/03

  KORENJAK v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 32897/12

  However, the Court emphasises in this connection that its position may be subject to review in the future depending, in particular, on the domestic courts" capacity to establish consistent case-law in line with the Convention requirements (see Demir, cited above, § 34; Taron v. Germany (dec.) no. 53126/07, § 45, 29 May 2012; and Korenjak v. Slovenia (dec.) no. 463/03, § 73, 15 May 2007).
• EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 77784/01

  NOGOLICA c. CROATIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 32897/12

  Thus, the Court has found that a newly established remedy in respect of length-of-proceedings complaints had to be exhausted, regardless of the lack of pertinent case-law (see Nogolica v. Croatia (dec.), no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII); a similar conclusion has been made, for example, in respect of a complaint concerning excessive length of pre-trial detention (see Demir v. Turkey (dec.), no. 51770/07, § 31, 16 October 2012).
• EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 53126/07

  TARON v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 32897/12

  However, the Court emphasises in this connection that its position may be subject to review in the future depending, in particular, on the domestic courts" capacity to establish consistent case-law in line with the Convention requirements (see Demir, cited above, § 34; Taron v. Germany (dec.) no. 53126/07, § 45, 29 May 2012; and Korenjak v. Slovenia (dec.) no. 463/03, § 73, 15 May 2007).

• EGMR, 07.07.2020 - 41553/18

  GURAVSKA v. LATVIA

  However, the Court has also accepted that States can choose to introduce a solely compensatory remedy in respect of the undue length of proceedings without that remedy being automatically regarded as ineffective (see Fakhretdinov and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 26716/09 and 2 others, 23 September 2010; see also Treial v. Estonia (dec.), no. 32897/12, §§ 39-45, 28 January 2014).