Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 48205/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,23122) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BOLEK AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 05.09.2000 - 44328/98
SOLOMON v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 48205/13
Factors to be taken into account in this context are the extent to which family life is effectively ruptured, the extent of the ties in the Contracting State, whether there are insurmountable obstacles to the family living in the country of origin of one or more of them and whether there are factors of immigration control (for example, a history of breaches of immigration law) or considerations of public order weighing in favour of exclusion (see, among others, Solomon v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 44328/98, 5 September 2000; and Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer, cited above, ibid.). - EGMR, 31.01.2006 - 50435/99
Schutz von Ehe und Familie, Abschiebung, Duldung, unerlaubter Aufenthalt, Kinder
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 48205/13
Nevertheless, in a case which concerns family life as well as immigration, the extent of a State's obligations to admit to its territory relatives of persons residing there will vary according to the particular circumstances of the persons involved and the general interest (see Gül v. Switzerland, judgment of 19 February 1996, Reports 1996-I, pp. 174-75, § 38; and Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer v. the Netherlands, no. 50435/99, § 39, ECHR 2006-I).
- EGMR, 14.05.2019 - 23270/16
ABOKAR v. SWEDEN
Factors to be taken into account in this context are the extent to which family life is effectively ruptured, the extent of the ties in the Contracting State, whether there are insurmountable obstacles to the family living in the country of origin of one or more of them and whether there are factors of immigration control (for example, a history of breaches of immigration law) or considerations of public order weighing in favour of exclusion (see, among others, Solomon v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 44328/98, 5 September 2000; Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer, cited above, ibid.; and Bolek and Others v. Sweden (dec.), no. 48205/13, 28 January 2014).