Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 35183/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,7310) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MEHMET KAPLAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 4860/09
TURGUT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 35183/08
A description of the domestic law and practise with respect to the Compensation Commission mentioned below (paragraphs 11-12) may be found in Turgut and Others v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 4860/09, 26 March 2013); Demiroglu and Others v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 56125/10, 4 June 2013); and Yildiz and Yanak v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 44013/07, 27 May 2014).Taking into account the Government's objection with regard to the applicants" failure to make use of the new domestic remedy established by Law no. 6384, the Court reiterates its conclusion in the cases of Turgut and Others ((dec.), no. 4860/09, §§ 47-59), and Yildiz and Yanak (cited above, §§ 29-38).
- EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 44013/07
YILDIZ ET YANAK c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 35183/08
A description of the domestic law and practise with respect to the Compensation Commission mentioned below (paragraphs 11-12) may be found in Turgut and Others v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 4860/09, 26 March 2013); Demiroglu and Others v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 56125/10, 4 June 2013); and Yildiz and Yanak v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 44013/07, 27 May 2014).Subsequently, in its decision in the case of Yildiz and Yanak ((dec.), no. 44013/07, 27 May 2014), the Court declared an application inadmissible on the ground that the applicants had failed to exhaust domestic remedies, that is to say the new remedy.
- EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 24240/07
ÜMMÜHAN KAPLAN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 35183/08
The Court observes that, as pointed out by the Government, a new domestic remedy has been established in Turkey following the application of the pilot judgment procedure in the case of Ümmühan Kaplan v. Turkey (no. 24240/07, 20 March 2012). - EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 56125/10
DEMIROGLU ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 35183/08
A description of the domestic law and practise with respect to the Compensation Commission mentioned below (paragraphs 11-12) may be found in Turgut and Others v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 4860/09, 26 March 2013); Demiroglu and Others v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 56125/10, 4 June 2013); and Yildiz and Yanak v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 44013/07, 27 May 2014).