Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HAMBERGER v. AUSTRIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 03.02.2005 - 37040/02

  RIEPL v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 49664/12

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Hackel v. Austria, no. 43463/09, §§ 18-21, 21 June 2016; Kugler v. Austria, no. 65631/01, §§ 39-42, 14 October 2010; Otto v. Austria, cited above, §§ 23-25; Strobel v. Austria, no. 25929/05, §§ 26-28, 4 June 2009; and Riepl v. Austria, no. 37040/02, §§ 37-42, 3 February 2005).
• EGMR, 28.06.1990 - 11761/85

  Obermeier ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 49664/12

  As regards what was at stake for the applicant, the Court considers that, in general, the declaration of the applicant's employment relationship as still valid was of particular importance to him (see, mutatis mutandis, Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, § 72, Series A no. 179).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 49664/12

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).

 
• EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 65631/01

  KUGLER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 49664/12

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Hackel v. Austria, no. 43463/09, §§ 18-21, 21 June 2016; Kugler v. Austria, no. 65631/01, §§ 39-42, 14 October 2010; Otto v. Austria, cited above, §§ 23-25; Strobel v. Austria, no. 25929/05, §§ 26-28, 4 June 2009; and Riepl v. Austria, no. 37040/02, §§ 37-42, 3 February 2005).
• EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 43463/09

  HACKEL v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 49664/12

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Hackel v. Austria, no. 43463/09, §§ 18-21, 21 June 2016; Kugler v. Austria, no. 65631/01, §§ 39-42, 14 October 2010; Otto v. Austria, cited above, §§ 23-25; Strobel v. Austria, no. 25929/05, §§ 26-28, 4 June 2009; and Riepl v. Austria, no. 37040/02, §§ 37-42, 3 February 2005).
• EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 12702/08

  OTTO v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 49664/12

  The period to be taken into consideration began on 26 September 2003, when the applicant lodged his request that his employment relationship with the Traun Municipality be declared as still valid (see paragraph 8 above; see Otto v. Austria, no. 12702/08, § 18, 22 October 2009), and ended on 9 February 2012, when the Administrative Court's final decision was served on the applicant's counsel (see paragraph 22 above).
• EGMR, 04.06.2009 - 25929/05

  STROBEL v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 49664/12

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Hackel v. Austria, no. 43463/09, §§ 18-21, 21 June 2016; Kugler v. Austria, no. 65631/01, §§ 39-42, 14 October 2010; Otto v. Austria, cited above, §§ 23-25; Strobel v. Austria, no. 25929/05, §§ 26-28, 4 June 2009; and Riepl v. Austria, no. 37040/02, §§ 37-42, 3 February 2005).