Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.03.2019 - 57814/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,6792) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ADAMKOWSKI v. POLAND
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.03.2019 - 57814/12
Once the Government have discharged their burden of proving that there was an appropriate and effective remedy available to the applicant, it is for the latter to show for example that the remedy was for some reason inadequate and ineffective in the particular circumstances of the case (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 12.11.2002 - 46129/99
ZVOLSKÝ AND ZVOLSKÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.03.2019 - 57814/12
That being so, the rules in question, or their application, should not prevent litigants from using an available remedy (see Zvolský and Zvolská v. the Czech Republic, no. 46129/99, § 51, ECHR 2002-IX). - EGMR, 19.06.2001 - 28249/95
KREUZ c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.03.2019 - 57814/12
In this way, that provision embodies the "right to a court", of which the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before a court in civil matters, constitutes one aspect only; however, it is an aspect that makes it in fact possible to benefit from the further guarantees laid down in paragraph 1 of Article 6 (see Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95, § 52, ECHR 2001-VI).