Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  I.D. v. BULGARIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 18.03.2004 - 43578/98
• EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 43578/98

Wird zitiert von ... (8)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 01.03.2002 - 48778/99

  KUTIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 43578/98

  The Court considers that the applicant has undoubtedly sustained a moral prejudice on account of the violation found in the present case (see Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 39, ECHR 2002-II, and Silvester's Horeca Service v. Belgium, no. 47650/99, § 38, 4 March 2004).
• EGMR, 13.02.2003 - 49636/99

  CHEVROL c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 43578/98

  The Court reiterates that for the determination of civil rights and obligations by a tribunal to satisfy Article 6 § 1, the tribunal in question must have jurisdiction to examine all questions of fact and law relevant to the dispute before it (see Terra Woningen B.V. v. the Netherlands, judgment of 17 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI, pp. 2122-23, § 52, and, more recently, Chevrol v. France [GC], no. 49636/99, § 77, ECHR 2003-III).
• EGMR, 04.03.2004 - 47650/99

  SILVESTER'S HORECA SERVICE c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 43578/98

  The Court considers that the applicant has undoubtedly sustained a moral prejudice on account of the violation found in the present case (see Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 39, ECHR 2002-II, and Silvester's Horeca Service v. Belgium, no. 47650/99, § 38, 4 March 2004).

 
• EGMR, 30.11.1987 - 8950/80

  H. v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 43578/98

  As regards procedural guarantees, it appears that the commissions had no clear rules of procedure (see H v. Belgium, judgment of 30 November 1987, Series A no. 127-B, p. 35, § 53), did not hold public hearings, and decided solely on the basis of a medical examination of the person concerned and of medical documents (see paragraph 29 above).
• EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 19589/92

  BRITISH-AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD c. PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 43578/98

  The Court must also examine whether the decisions of these commissions were subject to appeal before a court having full jurisdiction, because, if that was the case, no issue would arise under Article 6 § 1 (see Obermeier, cited above, p. 23, § 70, and British American Tobacco Company Ltd v. the Netherlands, judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 331, pp. 25-26, § 78).
• EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87

  DEMICOLI v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 43578/98

  In this connection, the Court finds that the commissions themselves cannot be considered as a tribunal conforming to the requirements of Article 6 § 1. According to the Court's case-law, a tribunal within the meaning of that provision must satisfy a series of requirements - independence, in particular of the executive, impartiality, duration of its members' terms of office, and guarantees afforded by its procedure - several of which appear in the text of Article 6 § 1 itself (see Belilos v. Switzerland, judgment of 29 April 1988, Series A no. 132, p. 29, § 64, Demicoli v. Malta, judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 210, p. 18, § 39, and Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781/94, § 233, ECHR 2001-IV).
• EGMR, 28.06.1990 - 11761/85

  Obermeier ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 43578/98

  Such holdings of the domestic courts - that they were bound by the findings of an administrative body made in separate proceedings - have already been examined by the Court in the cases of Obermeier v. Austria (judgment of 28 June 1990, Series A no. 179) and Terra Woningen B.V. (cited above).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 23805/94

  BELLET c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 43578/98

  Furthermore, for the right of access to a court to be effective, an individual must have a clear, practical opportunity to challenge an act which is an interference with his or her rights (see De Geouffre de la Pradelle v. France, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 253-B, p. 43, § 34, and Bellet v. France, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 333-B, p. 42, § 36).
• EGMR, 29.04.1988 - 10328/83

  BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 43578/98

  In this connection, the Court finds that the commissions themselves cannot be considered as a tribunal conforming to the requirements of Article 6 § 1. According to the Court's case-law, a tribunal within the meaning of that provision must satisfy a series of requirements - independence, in particular of the executive, impartiality, duration of its members' terms of office, and guarantees afforded by its procedure - several of which appear in the text of Article 6 § 1 itself (see Belilos v. Switzerland, judgment of 29 April 1988, Series A no. 132, p. 29, § 64, Demicoli v. Malta, judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 210, p. 18, § 39, and Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781/94, § 233, ECHR 2001-IV).

• EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 55391/13

  RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E SÁ v. PORTUGAL

  The Court reiterates that, for the determination of civil rights and obligations by a "tribunal" to satisfy Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the "tribunal" in question must have jurisdiction to examine all questions of fact and law relevant to the dispute before it (see Terra Woningen B.V. v. the Netherlands, 17 December 1996, § 52, Reports 1996-VI; Chevrol v. France, no. 49636/99, § 77, ECHR 2003-III; and I.D. v. Bulgaria, no. 43578/98, § 45, 28 April 2005).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 10.01.2017 - C-682/15

  Berlioz Investment Fund - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Richtlinie 2011/16/EU - …

  28 - Vgl. in diesem Sinne EGMR, 16. April 2013, Fazliyski/Bulgarien, CE:ECHR:2013:0416JUD004090805, §§ 59 und 60, EGMR, 24. November 2005, Capital Bank AD/Bulgarien, CE:ECHR:2005:1124JUD004942999, §§ 99 bis 108, sowie EGMR, 28. April 2005, 1. D./Bulgarien, CE:ECHR:2005:0428JUD004357898, §§ 50 bis 55.
• EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 32181/04

  SIGMA RADIO TELEVISION LTD v. CYPRUS

  The Court has therefore found violations of Article 6 § 1 in cases where the domestic courts considered themselves bound by the prior findings of administrative bodies which were decisive for the outcome of the cases before them, without examining the issues independently (see, amongst many authorities, Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, §§ 69-70, Series A no. 179; Terra Woningen B.V. v. the Netherlands, 17 December 1996, § 46 and §§ 50-55, Reports 1996-VI; I.D. v. Bulgaria, no. 43578/98, §§ 50-55, 28 April 2005; Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429/99, §§ 99-108 ECHR 2005-XII (extracts); Tsfayo, cited above; and Druzstevní zálozna Pria and Others v. the Czech Republic, no. 72034/01, § 112-115, 31 July 2008).

 
• EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 55391/13

  RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E SÁ c. PORTUGAL

  Pour satisfaire aux exigences de l'article 6 § 1, le « tribunal'visé par cette disposition doit avoir compétence pour se pencher sur toutes les questions de fait et de droit pertinentes pour le litige dont il se trouve saisi (Terra Woningen B.V. c. Pays-Bas, 17 décembre 1996, § 52, Recueil 1996-VI, Chevrol c. France, no 49636/99, § 77, CEDH 2003-III, et I.D. c. Bulgarie, no 43578/98, § 45, 28 avril 2005).
• EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 72034/01

  DRUZSTEVNÍ ZÁLOZNA PRIA AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  The Court reiterates that for the determination of civil rights and obligations by a tribunal to satisfy Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the tribunal in question must have jurisdiction to examine all questions of fact and law relevant to the dispute before it (see Terra Woningen B.V. v. the Netherlands, judgment of 17 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, § 52; Chevrol v. France [GC], no. 49636/99, § 77, ECHR 2003-III; and I.D. v. Bulgaria, no. 43578/98, § 45, 28 April 2005).
• EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 43800/12

  TSANOVA-GECHEVA c. BULGARIE

  Pour satisfaire aux exigences de l'article 6 § 1, le « tribunal'visé par cette disposition doit avoir compétence pour se pencher sur toutes les questions de fait et de droit pertinentes pour le litige dont il se trouve saisi (Terra Woningen B.V. c. Pays-Bas, 17 décembre 1996, § 52, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-VI, Chevrol c. France, no 49636/99, § 72, CEDH 2003-III, et I.D. c. Bulgarie, no 43578/98, § 45, 28 avril 2005).
• EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 9023/13

  TATO MARINHO DOS SANTOS COSTA ALVES DOS SANTOS ET FIGUEIREDO c. PORTUGAL

  Pour satisfaire aux exigences de l'article 6 § 1, le « tribunal'visé par cette disposition doit avoir compétence pour se pencher sur toutes les questions de fait et de droit pertinentes pour le litige dont il se trouve saisi (Terra Woningen B.V. c. Pays-Bas, 17 décembre 1996, § 52, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-VI, Chevrol c. France, no 49636/99, § 77, CEDH 2003-III, et I.D. c. Bulgarie, no 43578/98, § 45, 28 avril 2005).
• EGMR, 25.01.2018 - 8389/10

  KRUSHEV c. BULGARIE

  Elle admet que l'intéressé a subi un tort moral à raison du manquement relevé par le présent arrêt (voir, mutatis mutandis, I.D. c. Bulgarie, no 43578/98, § 59, 28 avril 2005, Fazliyski c. Bulgarie, no 40908/05, § 75, 16 avril 2013, et Myriana Petrova c. Bulgarie, no 57148/08, § 49, 21 juillet 2016).