Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 3564/11   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2013,10949
EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 3564/11 (https://dejure.org/2013,10949)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 28.05.2013 - 3564/11 (https://dejure.org/2013,10949)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 28. Mai 2013 - 3564/11 (https://dejure.org/2013,10949)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,10949) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    EREMIA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

    Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 14, Art. 14+3, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
    Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect) Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations Article 8-1 - Respect for home ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

  • EGMR, 25.03.1993 - 13134/87

    Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 3564/11
    The Court reiterates that ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum is relative: it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the nature and context of the treatment, its duration, its physical and mental effects and, in some instances, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 30, Series A no. 247-C and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI).

    To that end States are to maintain and apply in practice an adequate legal framework affording protection against acts of violence by private individuals (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 22 and 23, Series A no. 91; Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 36, Series A no. 247-C; D.P. and J.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 38719/97, § 118, 10 October 2002; M.C. v. Bulgaria, cited above, §§ 150 and 152, ECHR 2003-XII; Bevacqua, cited above, § 65, and Sandra Jankovic v. Croatia, no. 38478/05, § 45, 5 March 2009).

    To that end they are to maintain and apply in practice an adequate legal framework affording protection against acts of violence by private individuals (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, cited above, §§ 22 and 23; Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 36, Series A no. 247-C; D.P. and J.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 38719/97, § 118, 10 October 2002; M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 150 and 152, ECHR 2003-XII; A v. Croatia, no. 55164/08, § 60, 14 October 2010; and Hajduová, cited above, § 46).

  • EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

    M.C. c. BULGARIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 3564/11
    Furthermore, Article 3 requires that the authorities conduct an effective official investigation into the alleged ill-treatment even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 151, ECHR 2003-XII, and Denis Vasilyev v. Russia, no. 32704/04, §§ 98-99, 17 December 2009).

    To that end they are to maintain and apply in practice an adequate legal framework affording protection against acts of violence by private individuals (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, cited above, §§ 22 and 23; Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 36, Series A no. 247-C; D.P. and J.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 38719/97, § 118, 10 October 2002; M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 150 and 152, ECHR 2003-XII; A v. Croatia, no. 55164/08, § 60, 14 October 2010; and Hajduová, cited above, § 46).

  • EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

    HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 3564/11
    The Court will therefore examine whether the Republic of Moldova, in handling the second and third applicants" case, has been in breach of its positive obligation under Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 49, Series A no. 24).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 3564/11
    The Court reiterates that ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum is relative: it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the nature and context of the treatment, its duration, its physical and mental effects and, in some instances, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 30, Series A no. 247-C and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 32704/04

    DENIS VASILYEV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 3564/11
    Furthermore, Article 3 requires that the authorities conduct an effective official investigation into the alleged ill-treatment even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 151, ECHR 2003-XII, and Denis Vasilyev v. Russia, no. 32704/04, §§ 98-99, 17 December 2009).
  • EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

    Opuz ./. Türkei

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 3564/11
    A summary of the relevant international materials concerning protection from domestic violence, including its discriminatory nature against women, has been made in the case of Opuz v. Turkey (no. 33401/02, §§ 72-86, ECHR 2009).
  • EGMR, 04.03.2008 - 42722/02

    STOICA v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 3564/11
    Consideration has been given to the opening of investigations, delays in taking statements and to the length of time taken for the initial investigation (see Denis Vasilyev, cited above, § 100 with further references; and Stoica v. Romania, no. 42722/02, § 67, 4 March 2008).
  • EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95

    Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 3564/11
    The first applicant submitted that the authorities "had or ought to have had knowledge" of A."s violence against her (citing Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 73, ECHR 2001-V), given the number of assaults carried out by A. and incidents reported.
  • OLG Hamburg, 08.03.2018 - 1 Ws 114/17

    Eröffnung des Hauptverfahrens im Fall häuslicher Gewalt: Beweisverwertungsverbot

    Die hiernach gebotenen Untersuchungen werden dem erkennbar indes nur dann gerecht, wenn sie geeignet sind, den Sachverhalt festzustellen und zu einer Bestrafung der Verantwortlichen zu führen (EGMR, Urt. v. 28. Mai 2013 - 3564/11, NJOZ 2014, 1995).
  • EGMR, 19.10.2023 - 48618/22

    A.S. ET M.S. c. ITALIE

    La Cour rappelle que la notion de « vie privée'est une notion large, non susceptible d'une définition exhaustive, qui comprend des éléments se rapportant à l'identité d'une personne, tels que son nom, son image et son intégrité physique et morale (voir Denisov c. Ukraine [GC], no 76639/11, § 95, 25 septembre 2018, et Eremia c. République de Moldova, no 3564/11, § 73, 28 mai 2013, et X et Y c. Pays-Bas, 26 mars 1985, § 22, série A no 91).
  • VG Berlin, 18.10.2022 - 3 K 964.19

    Iran: Subsidiärer Schutz bei häuslicher Gewalt und zwangsweiser Trennung von

    Der Einzelrichter ist nach der Würdigung aller Umstände - insbesondere aufgrund des persönlichen Eindrucks in der mündlichen Verhandlung - davon hinreichend überzeugt, dass die Klägerin zu 1 im Iran vielfach Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt war und mithin einer nach Art. 3 EMRK verbotenen Misshandlung (vgl. EGMR, Urteil vom 28. Mai 2013 - 3564/11 - Eremia u.a ./. Moldau -, BeckRS).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht