Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOPNIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) Violation ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Kopnin and Others v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04

  BURDOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 2746/05

  The Government contested that argument, arguing that the pilot judgment delivered in the Burdov (no. 2) case (Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, ECHR 2009) had modified the Russian authorities" approach to the assessment of the remedies existing in the Russian Federation.
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 22774/93

  IMMOBILIARE SAFFI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 2746/05

  Although the Court accepts that a delay in the execution of a judgment may be justified in particular circumstances, in the present case the delay was such that it rendered nugatory the effect of the domestic judgment, as far as the prompt rehousing of the applicants was concerned (see, mutatis mutandis, Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00

  BURDOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 2746/05

  The Court reiterates that an unreasonably long delay in the enforcement of a binding judgment may breach the Convention (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III).

 
• EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 43883/02

  PLOTNIKOVY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 2746/05

  In this regard, the Court reiterates that it is not open to a State authority to cite a lack of funds or other resources, such as housing, as an excuse for not honoring a judgment debt (see Malinovskiy v. Russia, no. 41302/02, § 35, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts), and Plotnikovy v. Russia, no. 43883/02, § 23, 24 February 2005).
• EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 22000/03

  RAYLYAN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 2746/05

  To decide if the delay was reasonable, the Court will assess the complexity of the enforcement proceedings, the conduct of the applicant and the authorities, and the nature of the award (see Raylyan v. Russia, no. 22000/03, § 31, 15 February 2007).
• EGMR, 07.07.2005 - 41302/02

  MALINOVSKIY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 2746/05

  In this regard, the Court reiterates that it is not open to a State authority to cite a lack of funds or other resources, such as housing, as an excuse for not honoring a judgment debt (see Malinovskiy v. Russia, no. 41302/02, § 35, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts), and Plotnikovy v. Russia, no. 43883/02, § 23, 24 February 2005).

• EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 40618/04

  GORDEYEV v. RUSSIA

  Given what was at stake for the applicant and that the judgment of 17 January 2005 in this part was subject to immediate enforcement requiring special diligence, the Court finds that this delay was unreasonable (see, mutatis mutandis, Kopnin and Others v. Russia, no. 2746/05, § 33, 28 May 2014).