Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.05.2019 - 34394/08, 51224/08, 38629/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,31595) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LUCAS ELECTRIC INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE JSC AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
LUCAS ELEKTRIK SAN VE TIC A.S. v. TURKEY
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94
CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2019 - 34394/08
In determining whether this requirement is met, the Court recognises that the State enjoys a wide margin of appreciation with regard both to choosing the means of enforcement and to ascertaining whether the consequences of enforcement are justified in the general interest for the purpose of achieving the object of the law in question (see, among other authorities, Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94 and 2 others, § 75, ECHR 1999-III). - EGMR, 25.10.2001 - 41879/98
SAGGIO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2019 - 34394/08
As regards the proportionality of the interference at issue, the Court considers that the modalities of the reimbursement made to Iktisat Bank's creditors by the Fund intended to ensure the fair management of the creditors" claims (see Erdem and Egin-Erdem, cited above) in view of the bank's lack of financial resources to cover all of its debts (see, mutatis mutandis, Saggio v. Italy, no. 41879/98, § 35, 25 October 2001).