Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  Z v. BULGARIA

  Violation of Article 3+8 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Z v. BULGARIA

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (8)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 39326/02

  ÇELIK v. TURKEY (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2020 - 39257/17

  This means that the domestic judicial authorities must on no account be prepared to let the physical or psychological suffering inflicted go unpunished (see Çelik v Turkey (no. 2), no. 39326/02, § 34, 27 May 2010).

  The Court's task in the instant case is therefore to examine whether the proceedings as a whole had such significant flaws as to amount to a breach of the respondent State's positive obligations under Article 3 (see, similarly, Çelik v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 39326/02, § 34, 27 May 2010).

• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2020 - 39257/17

  The obligations incurred by the State under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention in cases involving and affecting a child, allegedly victim of sexual abuse, require the effective implementation of children's right to have their best interests as a primary consideration (see, in various contexts, the cases of Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615/07, § 134, ECHR 2010; Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 169, ECHR 2000-VIII, and Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152/06, § 138, ECHR 2016) and to have the child's particular vulnerability and corresponding needs adequately addressed by the domestic authorities (see, mutatis mutandis, O"Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810/09, § 146, ECHR 2014 (extracts), and M.G.C., cited above, § 73).
• EGMR, 13.06.1994 - 10588/83

  BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN (ARTICLE 50)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2020 - 39257/17

  The Court has already held that, as a rule, the requirement that domestic remedies should be exhausted does not apply to just satisfaction claims submitted to the Court under Article 41 (see, for instance, Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain (Article 50), 13 June 1994, § 17, Series A no. 285 C; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 129, ECHR 2006-IX; and Diena and Ozoli???. v. Latvia, no. 16657/03, § 93, 12 July 2007).

 
• EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 26692/05

  C.A.S. AND C.S. v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2020 - 39257/17

  The right to human dignity and psychological integrity requires particular attention where a child is the victim of violence (see C.A.S. and C.S. v. Romania, no. 26692/05, § 82, 20 March 2012).
• EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 61495/11

  M.G.C. v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2020 - 39257/17

  The Court has also repeatedly held that in cases of sexual abuse children are particularly vulnerable (see A and B, cited above, § 111; M.C., cited above, §§ 150 and 183, and M.G.C. v. Romania, no. 61495/11, § 56, 15 March 2016).
• EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 52067/99

  OKKALI c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2020 - 39257/17

  In such cases the proceedings as a whole, including the trial stage, must meet the requirements of the prohibition enshrined in Article 3 (see Okkali v. Turkey, no. 52067/99, § 65, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2020 - 39257/17

  The Court has already held that, as a rule, the requirement that domestic remedies should be exhausted does not apply to just satisfaction claims submitted to the Court under Article 41 (see, for instance, Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain (Article 50), 13 June 1994, § 17, Series A no. 285 C; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 129, ECHR 2006-IX; and Diena and Ozoli???. v. Latvia, no. 16657/03, § 93, 12 July 2007).
• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

  M.C. c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2020 - 39257/17

  The relevant principles concerning the State's obligation inherent in Article 3 of the Convention to investigate cases of ill-treatment, and in particular sexual abuse committed by private individuals, are set out in M.C. v. Bulgaria (no. 39272/98, §§ 149, 151 and 153, ECHR 2003-XII).

• EGMR, 13.02.2024 - 38588/21

  X v. GREECE

  Having regard to the circumstances of the individual case and in light of the above, the fact that the applicant did not raise her complaints in substance as a party to the proceedings cannot be held against her as, having filed a criminal complaint she had raised her grievances before the relevant national authorities and had requested that the case be prosecuted while she had not been informed on the possibility to make a declaration in support of the charges against the accused (see also Z v. Bulgaria, no. 39257/17, § 81, 28 May 2020, and Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 59, 14 December 2000).
• EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 15798/20

  VUCKOVIC v. CROATIA

  That positive obligation further requires the criminalisation and effective prosecution of all non-consensual sexual acts (see M.G.C. v. Romania, no. 61495/11, § 59, 15 March 2016; Z v. Bulgaria, no. 39257/17, § 67, 28 May 2020; and E.G. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 37882/13, § 39, 13 April 2021).
• EGMR, 09.02.2021 - 40591/11

  N.Ç. c. TURQUIE

  L'absence d'un effort substantiel de la part des autorités nationales en vue d'établir toutes les circonstances entourant les faits et de ne pas procéder à une évaluation contextuelle du consentement de la victime pourrait engendrer des problèmes vis-à-vis des dispositions en jeu (Z c. Bulgarie, no 39257/17, §§ 68-70 et 74, 28 mai 2020).

 
• EGMR, 01.12.2022 - 14260/17

  D.K. c. ITALIE

  Cette obligation positive commande en outre la criminalisation et la répression effective de tout acte sexuel non consensuel (M.G.C. c. Roumanie, no 61495/11, § 59, 15 mars 2016, et Z. c. Bulgarie, no 39257/17, § 67, 28 mai 2020).
• EGMR, 13.04.2021 - 37882/13

  E.G. c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  Cette obligation positive commande en outre la criminalisation et la répression effective de tout acte sexuel non consensuel (M.G.C. c. Roumanie, no 61495/11, § 59, 15 mars 2016, et Z c. Bulgarie, no 39257/17, § 67, 28 mai 2020).
• EGMR, 21.09.2021 - 61717/16

  R.G. AND N.G. v. BULGARIA

  Relevant domestic law and practice 26. The substantive criminal law in Bulgaria relating to rape has been set out in detail in M.C. v. Bulgaria (no. 39272/98, §§ 74-86, ECHR 2003-XII) and Z v. Bulgaria (no. 39257/17, §§ 38-40, 28 May 2020).
• EGMR, 17.05.2022 - 23614/20

  Y.P. c. BULGARIE

  Sur le fond 13. La Cour renvoie aux principes généraux de sa jurisprudence concernant l'obligation procédurale découlant des articles 3 et 8 de la Convention tels qu'exposés dans les arrêts X et autres c. Bulgarie ([GC], no 22457/16, §§ 184-190, 2 février 2021), Y c. Bulgarie (no 41990/18, §§ 80-83, 20 février 2020), et Z c. Bulgarie (no 39257/17, §§ 65-69, 28 mai 2020).
• EGMR, 17.05.2022 - 105/14

  I.B. v. BULGARIA

  The applicant admitted all facts as described in the indictment and agreed that no additional evidence be collected (relevant domestic case-law in regard to that procedure has been summarised in Z v. Bulgaria, no. 39257/17, §§ 44-47, 28 May 2020).