Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 70926/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,51991) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BROKA v. LATVIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
No violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 70926/01
According to the Court's case law, the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 128, 8 June 2006; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 177, ECHR 2006-...; and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 57381/00
KOZLOVA ET SMIRNOVA contre la LETTONIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 70926/01
Both laws are covered by the reservation made by the Latvian government in their instrument of ratification, and this reservation has been declared valid by the Court (see Kozlova and Smirnova v. Latvia (dec.), no. 57381/00, ECHR 2001-XI). - EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01
Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 70926/01
According to the Court's case law, the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 128, 8 June 2006; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 177, ECHR 2006-...; and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 11796/85
WIESINGER v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 70926/01
As to the adjournment of proceedings pending the outcome of other cases, the Court reiterates that the "reasonable time" requirement within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 must be assessed according to the Court's own case law and not according to the internal law of the respondent State (see, mutatis mutandis, Wiesinger v. Austria, judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 213, p. 22, § 60, and G. v. Italy, judgment of 27 February 1992, Series A no. 228-F, p. 68, § 17).