Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 41238/05   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2011,55451
EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 41238/05 (https://dejure.org/2011,55451)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 28.06.2011 - 41238/05 (https://dejure.org/2011,55451)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 28. Juni 2011 - 41238/05 (https://dejure.org/2011,55451)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,55451) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (8)

  • EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 5515/09

    HORVÁTH v. SLOVAKIA

    In this connection, the Court observes that it has recently examined and dismissed similar objections in the following cases against Slovakia: Kormos (no. 46092/06, 8 November 2011), Karlin (no. 41238/05, 28 June 2011), Aydemir (no. 44153/06, 8 February 2011), Michalko (no. 35377/05, 21 December 2010), Osváthová (no. 15684/05, 21 December 2010), and Stetiar and Sutek (nos. 20271/06 and 17517/07, 23 November 2010).
  • EGMR, 28.04.2015 - 15259/11

    MASLÁK c. SLOVAQUIE

    The period under consideration thus commenced on 26 May 2009 and ended on 2 September 2009 (see Karlin v. Slovakia, no. 41238/05, § 97, 28 June 2011, with further references), that is to say after three months and eight days, or in other words 98 days, within which period the applicant's request for release was examined by the OSP and two levels of courts.
  • EGMR, 13.05.2014 - 1349/12

    L.G.R. AND A.P.R. v. SLOVAKIA

    57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00, ECHR 2002-IX; Skurcák v. Slovakia, no. 58708/00, §§ 29-30, 5 December 2006; Supák v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 4973/03, 23 February 2010; Karlin v. Slovakia, no. 41238/05, § 71, 28 June 2011; and many others).
  • EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 64528/09

    SCHVARC v. SLOVAKIA

    With reference to its case-law both at the relevant time and subsequently (for comparison see, for example, Kadem v. Malta, no. 55263/00, 9 January 2003; Rapacciuolo v. Italy, no. 76024/01, 19 May 2005; Vejmola v. the Czech Republic, no. 57246/00, §§ 47 and 56, 25 October 2005; and - more recently - Gál v. Slovakia, no. 45426/06, 30 November 2010; Karlin v. Slovakia, no. 41238/05, 28 June 2011; Rahmani and Dineva v. Bulgaria, no. 20116/08, 10 May 2012; Shakurov v. Russia, no. 55822/10, 5 June 2012; Abidov v. Russia, no. 52805/10, 12 June 2012; and Alikhonov v. Russia, no. 35692/11, 31 July 2012), the Court considers that the sum awarded as just satisfaction by the Constitutional Court was not sufficient to provide the applicant with appropriate redress in the circumstances.
  • EGMR, 30.04.2013 - 45426/06

    GÁL ET 6 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA SLOVAQUIE

    41238/05.
  • EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 11037/12

    MASLÁK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

    The periods under the Court's consideration therefore ended with the service on the applicants of the final decision of the ordinary courts on 26 July and 2 August 2010 and 2 March 2011 (see paragraphs 12, 17 and 22 above) (see Karlin v. Slovakia, no. 41238/05, § 97, 28 June 2011, with further references) and with the applicants" release on 15 November 2011 (see paragraph 29 above) (see Kormos, cited above, § 94).
  • EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 71123/13

    DEGRO v. SLOVAKIA

    57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00, ECHR 2002-IX; Skurcák v. Slovakia, no. 58708/00, §§ 29-30, 5 December 2006; Supák v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 4973/03, 23 February 2010; Karlin v. Slovakia, no. 41238/05, § 71, 28 June 2011; and many others).
  • EGMR, 21.01.2014 - 63800/10

    ALOJZ v. SLOVAKIA

    The Court notes that the compensation awarded in the present case by the Constitutional Court is somewhat lower than the Court's own awards in similar cases (for comparison see, for example, Kadem v. Malta, no. 55263/00, 9 January 2003; Rapacciuolo v. Italy, no. 76024/01, 19 May 2005; Vejmola v. the Czech Republic, no. 57246/00, §§ 47 and 56, 25 October 2005; and - more recently - Gál v. Slovakia, no. 45426/06, 30 November 2010; Karlin v. Slovakia, no. 41238/05, 28 June 2011; Rahmani and Dineva v. Bulgaria, no. 20116/08, 10 May 2012; Shakurov v. Russia, no. 55822/10, 5 June 2012; Abidov v. Russia, no. 52805/10, 12 June 2012; and Alikhonov v. Russia, no. 35692/11, 31 July 2012).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht