Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MALEC v. POLAND

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MALEC v. POLAND

  Art. 8 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92

  HOKKANEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 28623/12

  Hence, the Court has repeatedly held that Article 8 includes the right for parents to have measures taken that will permit them to be reunited with their children and an obligation on part of the national authorities to take such action (see, amongst many others, Hokkanen v Finland, 23 September 1994, § 55, Series A no. 299-A and Cristescu v. Romania, no. 13589/07, § 57, 10 January 2012).
• EGMR, 24.03.1988 - 10465/83

  OLSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 28623/12

  The Court reiterates that the mutual enjoyment by parent and child of each other's company constitutes a fundamental element of family life within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), 24 March 1988, § 59, Series A no. 130, and Vojnity v. Hungary, no. 29617/07, § 28, 12 February 2013).

• EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 32407/13

  KACPER NOWAKOWSKI v. POLAND

  36812/97 and 40104/98, § 59, 24 April 2003; and, mutatis mutandis, in respect of the steps required to enforce existing contact arrangements, P.K. v. Poland, cited above, § 87; Malec v. Poland, no. 28623/12, § 69, 28 June 2016; Cristescu, cited above, § 61; and Manuello and Nevi v. Italy, no. 107/10, § 52, 20 January 2015).
• EGMR, 19.10.2023 - 48618/22

  A.S. ET M.S. c. ITALIE

  Vie familiale 138. Les principes généraux relatifs aux obligations positives des autorités nationales d'adopter des mesures propres à maintenir les liens unissant un enfant à son parent en cas d'opposition du parent qui vit avec l'enfant sont résumés dans les arrêts Ribic c. Croatie (no 27148/12, §§ 92-96, 2 avril 2015), K.B. et autres précité, §§ 142-144, Malec c. Pologne (no 28623/12, §§ 66-67, 28 juin 2016), et A.T. c. Italie (no 40910/19, §§ 66-68, 24 juin 2021).
• EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 4065/21

  BELUCH v. POLAND

  The general principles concerning respect for family life, positive obligations of the State and the importance of the interests of a child in matters concerning child custody were summarised in the judgment in P.K. v. Poland, no. 43123/10, §§ 81-86, 10 June 2014, and in Malec v. Poland, no. 28623/12, §§ 66-67, 28 June 2016.
• EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 38631/18

  MARUT v. POLAND

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to respect for his family life in connection with non-enforcement of contact arrangements (see for example, Zawadka v. Poland, no. 48542/99, § 68, 23 June 2005; Pawlik v. Poland, no. 11638/02, § 55, 19 June 2007; Malec v. Poland, no. 28623/12, § 78, 28 June 2016; and, among other authorities, Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 96, ECHR 2000-I).