Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 30173/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,32461) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
JØRGENSEN AND OTHERS v. DENMARK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
JØRGENSEN AND OTHERS v. DENMARK
Wird zitiert von ... (6) Neu Zitiert selbst (11)
- EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 24329/02
SOARE ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 30173/12
The Court reiterates, as concerns the accessibility of an investigation to the families and the existence of sufficient public scrutiny, that this aspect of the procedural obligation does not require applicants to have access to police files, or copies of all documents during an ongoing inquiry, or that they be consulted or informed about every step (see, for example, Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 236, ECHR 2016; Soare and Others v. Romania, no. 24329/02, § 174, 22 February 2011, Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 347, ECHR 2007-II, and Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, cited above § 77). - EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 30173/12
The Court reiterates, as concerns the accessibility of an investigation to the families and the existence of sufficient public scrutiny, that this aspect of the procedural obligation does not require applicants to have access to police files, or copies of all documents during an ongoing inquiry, or that they be consulted or informed about every step (see, for example, Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 236, ECHR 2016; Soare and Others v. Romania, no. 24329/02, § 174, 22 February 2011, Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 347, ECHR 2007-II, and Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, cited above § 77). - EGMR, 26.01.2006 - 77617/01
MIKHEYEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 30173/12
However, in cases where the authorities may not necessarily be aware of an allegation that State agents intentionally have used lethal force, the lodging of a formal criminal complaint aimed at the prosecuting authorities of the respondent State to identify and punish the perpetrators is, in principle, considered an effective remedy, which should be used (see, inter alia, El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630/09, § 140, ECHR 2012; Feti Demirtas v. Turkey, no. § 82, 17 January 2012; and Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, § 86, 26 January 2006).
- EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 60441/13
GÜRTEKIN AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 30173/12
The obligation is of means only, not result (see, among others, Gürtekin and Others v. Cyprus (dec), no. 60441/13, 11 March 2014, and Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 394, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts)). - EGMR, 04.01.2007 - 18727/06
SZULA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 30173/12
There is no right, however, to obtain a prosecution or conviction (see, inter alia, Szula v. the United Kingdom, (dec.) no. 18727/06, 4 January 2007) and the fact that an investigation ends without concrete, or with only limited, results is not indicative of any failings as such. - EGMR - 45886/07
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 30173/12
10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 221-223, 227 and 234, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, §§ 83-88, ECHR 2000-VII; Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, §§ 61-62, ECHR 2000-VII; and Andronicou and Constantinou v. Cyprus, 9 October 1997, § 161, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI. - EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 24746/94
HUGH JORDAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 30173/12
It is not for the authorities to prove that there has been no breach of Article 2 of the Convention (see, Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, § 113, ECHR 2001-III (extracts)), but a satisfactory and plausible explanation regarding the necessity is required by the authorities (ibid., § 124). - EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94
AVSAR c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 30173/12
The obligation is of means only, not result (see, among others, Gürtekin and Others v. Cyprus (dec), no. 60441/13, 11 March 2014, and Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 394, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts)). - EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57948/00
- EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73
AIREY v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 30173/12
18299/03 and 27311/03, § 199, 18 March 2010; Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 7888/03, 13 March 2007; and Caraher v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 24520/94, 11 January 2000; and Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 23, Series A no. 32). - EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57947/00
ISSAIEVA, YOUSSOUPOVA ET BAZAÏEVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 03.10.2023 - 27753/19
EL-ASMAR v. DENMARK
Moreover, by virtue of section 975 of the Administration of Justice Act (Retsplejeloven), when the prosecution has decided not to bring charges in a criminal case, the case can only be re-opened if at a later stage new evidence of significant weight emerges (see, among other authorities, Jørgensen and Others v. Denmark (dec.), no. 30173/12, § 36, 28 June 2016).To the extent that the Government's objection is to be understood as arguing that the applicant, after the Regional Prosecutor's decision to discontinue the criminal proceedings, should have instituted civil proceedings under Article 63 of the Constitution in order to challenge the use of force and possibly obtain compensation, the Court reiterates that in the area of unlawful use of force by State agents - and not mere fault, omission or negligence - civil or administrative proceedings aimed solely at awarding damages, rather than ensuring the identification and punishment of those responsible, are not adequate and effective remedies capable of providing redress for complaints based on the substantive aspect of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention (see, for example, Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080/13, § 135, 19 December 2017; Semache v. France, no. 36083/16, § 53, 21 June 2018; and Jørgensen and Others v. Denmark (dec.), no. 30173/12, §§ 62-64, 28 June 2016).
- EGMR, 10.12.2019 - 11703/07
KAFES c. TURQUIE
Par conséquent, elle ne peut pas prendre en considération ce recours aux fins du calcul du délai de six mois s'agissant des griefs tirés de l'article 3 de la Convention (voir, mutatis mutandis, Stig Wolch Jørgensen et autres c. Danemark (déc.), no 30173/12, §§ 55-63, 28 juin 2016). - EGMR, 26.02.2019 - 51181/10
GÜZÜPEK v. TURKEY
The Court finds, therefore, that although the applicant lodged the present application within six months of the date of notification to him on 25 March 2010 of the final decision taken at the end of the compensation proceedings (see paragraph 31 above), those proceedings do not affect the running of the six-month period (see, mutatis mutandis, Alkin, cited above, § 33; see also Erkan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 41792/10, §§ 64-65, 28 January 2014, and Jørgensen and Others v. Denmark (dec.), no. 30173/12, §§ 62-63, 28 June 2016).
- EGMR, 12.02.2019 - 57273/16
CHAABAN ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 29.11.2022 - 79650/16
ARSLAN c. TÜRKIYE
À cet égard, la Cour tient à rappeler qu'au regard de l'article 2 de la Convention, une enquête de nature pénale s'avère généralement nécessaire lorsque la mort a été infligée volontairement (Stig Wolch Jørgensen et autres c. Danemark (déc.), no 30173/12, § 51, 28 juin 2016), que l'obligation de l'État à prendre les mesures nécessaires à la protection de la vie des personnes relevant de sa juridiction requiert, par implication, qu'une enquête officielle effective soit menée lorsque le recours à la force a entraîné mort d'homme (Güzelyurtlu et autres c. Chypre et Turquie [GC], no 36925/07, § 218, 29 janvier 2019, et Mustafa Tunç et Fecire Tunç c. Turquie [GC], no 24014/05, § 169, 14 avril 2015) et que dès lors, les obligations procédurales découlant de l'article 2 de la Convention ne sauraient être satisfaites par le seul octroi de dommages-intérêts (Al-Skeini et autres c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 55721/07, § 165, CEDH 2011). - EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 17521/09
TEYMURAZYAN v. ARMENIA
It reiterates that in the area of unlawful use of force by State agents - and not mere fault, omission or negligence - civil or administrative proceedings aimed solely at awarding damages, rather than ensuring the identification and punishment of those responsible, are not considered adequate and effective remedies capable of providing redress for complaints based on the substantive aspect of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention (see Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09 and 2 others, § 227, ECHR 2014 (extracts), and Jørgensen and Others v. Denmark (dec.), no. 30173/12, 28 June 2016).