Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 38597/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,15345) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KABAR v. TURKEY
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
KABAR v. TURKEY
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 38597/14
- EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 38597/14
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88
DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 38597/14
The Court should establish whether the applicant, a party to the civil proceedings, was given a reasonable opportunity to have knowledge of and comment on the observations made or evidence adduced by the other party and to present his case under conditions that did not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see, among many others, Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, § 33, Series A no. 274; Avotins v. Latvia [GC], no. 17502/07, § 119, 23 May 2016; and Dirama v. Turkey [Committee], no. 20797/07, § 24, 13 November 2018). - EGMR, 06.05.1985 - 8658/79
Bönisch ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 38597/14
In its case-law the Court has recognised that the lack of neutrality on the part of a court-appointed expert may in certain circumstances give rise to a breach of the principle of equality of arms inherent in the concept of a fair trial (see Bönisch v. Austria, 6 May 1985, §§ 30-35, Series A no. 92, and Letincic v. Croatia, no. 7183/11, § 51, 3 May 2016). - EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 20982/07
PRADZYNSKA - POZDNIAKOW v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 38597/14
The Court finds that the amount proposed in the Government's unilateral declaration does not correspond to its own awards in similar cases, and the Government did not provide any valid reasons why the unilateral declaration should nonetheless be accepted (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary issue) [GC], no. 26307/95, § 75, ECHR 2003-VI, and Pradzynska-Pozdniakow v. Poland, no. 20982/07, § 37, 7 July 2009). - EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 7183/11
LETINCIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 38597/14
In its case-law the Court has recognised that the lack of neutrality on the part of a court-appointed expert may in certain circumstances give rise to a breach of the principle of equality of arms inherent in the concept of a fair trial (see Bönisch v. Austria, 6 May 1985, §§ 30-35, Series A no. 92, and Letincic v. Croatia, no. 7183/11, § 51, 3 May 2016).