|EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 25381/02|
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SEYITHAN DEMIR v. TURKEY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 1+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 41 MRK
Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c Non-pecuniary damage - award Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (englisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
- EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 28439/03
HAKAN DUMAN v. TURKEYIn such circumstances it cannot be said, therefore, that the applicant had unequivocally and intentionally waived his rights under Article 6 (see, mutatis mutandis, Seyithan Demir v. Turkey, no. 25381/02, § 41, 28 July 2009, and Savas v. Turkey, no. 9762/03, § 70, 8 December 2009).
- EGMR, 04.09.2018 - 28338/07
ÖMER GÜNER v. TURKEYIt concludes therefore that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the applicant's complaint under Article 10 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Seyithan Demir v. Turkey, no. 25381/02, § 47, 28 July 2009).
- EGMR - 65151/10 (anhängig)
TÜMEN v. TURKEYIn particular, has there been a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 6 § 3 (c), as a result of the fact that the proceedings before the first-instance had taken place in the applicant's absence? In this connection, could the applicant be considered to have unequivocally and intentionally waived his right to appear before the Mus Criminal Court of General Jurisdiction and to defend himself? Was he provided with sufficient information regarding the consequences of the request to be exempted from the obligation to appear at the trial court (see Seyithan Demir v. Turkey, no. 25381/02, §§ 41-42, 28 July 2009)?.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.