Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RACHWALSKI AND FERENC v. POLAND

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 8 Non-pecuniary damage - award Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 47709/99
• EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 47709/99
• EGMR, 21.09.2016 - 47709/99

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 47709/99

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see Labita v Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, 6.4.2000, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 47709/99

  Furthermore, in considering whether a treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. Even the absence of such a purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of Article 3 (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68, ECHR 2001-III; Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Iwanczuk v. Poland, no. 25196/94, § 52, 15 November 2001).
• EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 47709/99

  Furthermore, in considering whether a treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. Even the absence of such a purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of Article 3 (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68, ECHR 2001-III; Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Iwanczuk v. Poland, no. 25196/94, § 52, 15 November 2001).

 
• EGMR, 15.11.2001 - 25196/94

  IWÁNCZUK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 47709/99

  Furthermore, in considering whether a treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. Even the absence of such a purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of Article 3 (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68, ECHR 2001-III; Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Iwanczuk v. Poland, no. 25196/94, § 52, 15 November 2001).
• EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 47709/99

  Moreover, it is sufficient if the victim is humiliated in his or her own eyes (see Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, p. 16, § 32, and Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985/96 ; 33986/96, § 120).
• EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

  KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 47709/99

  The Court reiterates that recourse to physical force against a person which has not been made strictly necessary by his or her own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3. Such a strict proportionality approach has been accepted by the Court also in respect of a situation where an individual is already under the full control of the police (see, among others, Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, § 30, Series A no. 269; Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 68-78, ECHR 2000-XII; Milan c. France, no.7549/03, 24 January 2008, § 68).
• EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71

  Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 47709/99

  The exceptions provided for in paragraph 2 of Article 8 of the Convention are to be interpreted narrowly (see Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 42, Series A no. 28), and the need for them in a given case must be convincingly established.
• EGMR, 25.03.1993 - 13134/87

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 47709/99

  The same holds true in so far as degrading treatment is concerned (see Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 March 1993, Series A no. 247-C, p. 59, § 30).

• EGMR, 10.11.2015 - 58500/10

  SLAVOV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE

  La Cour tient à rappeler en particulier que tout recours à la force physique par les agents de l'État à l'encontre d'une personne qui n'est pas rendu strictement nécessaire par le comportement de celle-ci rabaisse sa dignité humaine et, de ce fait, constitue une violation des droits garantis par l'article 3 (Rachwalski et Ferenc c. Pologne, no 47709/99, § 59, 28 juillet 2009).