Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GÖK AND GÜLER v. TURKEY

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 1+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 3 (procedural aspect) Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c Non-pecuniary damage - award Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 30.08.2005 - 74307/01
• EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 74307/01

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 74307/01

  Such proof may, however, follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 74307/01

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 3 (see, in particular, ErdoÄ?an YaÄ?ız v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, §§ 35-37, ECHR 2007-... (extracts), Hacı Özen v. Turkey, no. 46286/99, §§ 44-45, 12 April 2007, Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX, and Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 14.11.2002 - 67263/01

  MOUISEL v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 74307/01

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 3 (see, in particular, ErdoÄ?an YaÄ?ız v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, §§ 35-37, ECHR 2007-... (extracts), Hacı Özen v. Turkey, no. 46286/99, §§ 44-45, 12 April 2007, Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX, and Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).

 
• EGMR, 02.08.2005 - 35811/97

  KOLU c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 74307/01

  The relevant domestic law and practice in force at the material time as well as recent developments can be found in the following judgments: Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, §§ 52-54, ECHR 2005-IV; AydoÄ?an and Others v. Turkey, no. 41967/02, § 17, 2 December 2008; Kolu v. Turkey, no. 35811/97, § 44, 2 August 2005; and Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, §§ 27-31, 27 November 2008.
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 74307/01

  On this point, the Court relies on the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning the notion of a fair procedure under Article 6 (see, in particular, Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 36, Series A no. 275, Öcalan, cited above, § 131, Salduz, cited above, § 55, and Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 100, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 27473/02

  ERDOGAN YAGIZ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 74307/01

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 3 (see, in particular, ErdoÄ?an YaÄ?ız v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, §§ 35-37, ECHR 2007-... (extracts), Hacı Özen v. Turkey, no. 46286/99, §§ 44-45, 12 April 2007, Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX, and Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 41967/02

  AYDOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 74307/01

  The relevant domestic law and practice in force at the material time as well as recent developments can be found in the following judgments: Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, §§ 52-54, ECHR 2005-IV; AydoÄ?an and Others v. Turkey, no. 41967/02, § 17, 2 December 2008; Kolu v. Turkey, no. 35811/97, § 44, 2 August 2005; and Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, §§ 27-31, 27 November 2008.
• EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

  IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 74307/01

  On this point, the Court relies on the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning the notion of a fair procedure under Article 6 (see, in particular, Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 36, Series A no. 275, Öcalan, cited above, § 131, Salduz, cited above, § 55, and Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 100, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

  EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 74307/01

  The Court's task under the Convention is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (see, among other authorities, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 34, Series A no. 247-B).