Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PROCOLA c. LUXEMBOURG

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'Art. 6-1 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Remboursement frais et dépens (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PROCOLA v. LUXEMBOURG

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Costs and expenses award (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 01.07.1993 - 14570/89
• EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 14570/89, 27/1994/474/555

Wird zitiert von ... (39)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90

  VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 14570/89

  Having regard to the close connection between the proceedings brought by Procola and the consequences that their outcome might have had for one of its pecuniary rights, and for its economic activities in general, the right in question was a civil one (see the Editions Périscope judgment, previously cited, p. 66, para. 40; the Beaumartin judgment, previously cited, pp. 60-61, para. 28; the Ortenberg v. Austria judgment of 25 November 1994, Series A no. 295-B, pp. 48-49, para. 28; and, by implication, the Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, p. 16, para. 43).
• EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 11760/85

  ÉDITIONS PÉRISCOPE v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 14570/89

  The applicant association's case was sufficiently tenable, since the Conseil d'Etat conducted a detailed examination of the conflicting arguments (see the Neves e Silva v. Portugal judgment of 27 April 1989, Series A no. 153-A, p. 14, para. 37, and the Editions Périscope v. France judgment of 26 March 1992, Series A no. 234-B, p. 65, para. 38).
• EGMR, 25.11.1994 - 12884/87

  ORTENBERG c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 14570/89

  Having regard to the close connection between the proceedings brought by Procola and the consequences that their outcome might have had for one of its pecuniary rights, and for its economic activities in general, the right in question was a civil one (see the Editions Périscope judgment, previously cited, p. 66, para. 40; the Beaumartin judgment, previously cited, pp. 60-61, para. 28; the Ortenberg v. Austria judgment of 25 November 1994, Series A no. 295-B, pp. 48-49, para. 28; and, by implication, the Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, p. 16, para. 43).
• EGMR, 24.11.1994 - 15287/89

  BEAUMARTIN c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 14570/89

  1 (art. 6-1) is applicable where an action is "pecuniary" in nature and is founded on an alleged infringement of rights which are likewise pecuniary rights, notwithstanding the origin of the dispute and the fact that the administrative courts have jurisdiction (see, among other authorities, the Editions Périscope judgment, previously cited, p. 66, para. 40, and the Beaumartin v. France judgment of 24 November 1994, Series A no. 296-B, pp. 60-61, para. 28).

• EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 45036/98

  Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi ./. Irland

  The Convention institutions had on numerous occasions examined the compatibility with the Convention of the discretion exercised by a State in applying Community law (see, inter alia, Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands, judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288; Procola v. Luxembourg, judgment of 28 September 1995, Series A no. 326; Cantoni and Hornsby, both cited above; Pafitis and Others v. Greece, judgment of 26 February 1998, Reports 1998-I; Matthews, cited above; S.A. Dangeville v. France, no. 36677/97, ECHR 2002-III; and Société Colas Est and Others v. France, no. 37971/97, ECHR 2002-III).
• BVerfG, 22.03.2018 - 2 BvR 780/16

  Vorschriften zum Einsatz von Verwaltungsrichtern auf Zeit sind mit der Verfassung …

  Eine grundsätzliche, auch sukzessive Unvereinbarkeit der Tätigkeiten in verschiedenen Staatsgewalten hat der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte nicht angenommen (EGMR, Procola v. Luxembourg, Urteil vom 28. September 1995, Nr. 14570/89, Rn. 44 ff.; EGMR , Kleyn and others v. The Netherlands…, Urteil vom 6. Mai 2003, Nr. 39343/98 u.a., Rn. 190 ff.; EGMR, McGonnell v. The United Kingdom…, Urteil vom 8. Februar 2000, Nr. 28488/95, Rn. 51 ff.).
• BVerfG, 08.11.2022 - 2 BvR 2480/10

  Verfassungsbeschwerden betreffend das Rechtsschutzsystem des Europäischen …

  So hat der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte etwa die Unparteilichkeit eines Gerichts angezweifelt, weil einige der an der gerichtlichen Entscheidung mitwirkenden Richter zuvor die Verwaltung in dieser Sache juristisch beraten hatten (vgl. EGMR, Procola v. Luxembourg, Urteil vom 28. September 1995, Nr. 14570/89, § 45 - "structural impartiality"; Kleyn u.a. v. Netherlands, Urteil vom 6. Mai 2003, Nr. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 und 46664/99, § 196 ff.).

 
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 39343/98

  KLEYN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Mr and Mrs Raymakers cited the European Court's judgment of 28 September 1995 in Procola v. Luxembourg (Series A no. 326).

  In a memorandum appended to a letter dated 12 February 1998 to the Chairman of the Lower House, the Minister for Justice and the Minister of the Interior informed the Lower House that, in view of Procola (Series A no. 326) and given the fact that there was not yet communis opinio about its precise scope and its possible consequences for the Netherlands, the Council of State had adopted a provisional practice in anticipation of further clarification by the European Court of Human Rights in its future case-law (Lower House parliamentary documents 1997-98, 25 425, no. 3).

  In their brief remarks about the remedy before the civil courts, the Government have not cited any domestic case-law in which a civil court agreed to hear an administrative appeal on the ground that, in view of the Court's judgment of 28 September 1995 in Procola v. Luxembourg (Series A no. 326), the Administrative Jurisdiction Division afforded insufficient guarantees as to independence and impartiality.

  In Procola v. Luxembourg (judgment of 28 September 1995, Series A no. 326, p. 16, § 45) the Court stated: "The Court notes that four members of the Conseil d'Etat carried out both advisory and judicial functions in the same case.

• EGMR, 12.12.2002 - 59021/00

  Massaker von Distomo

  Der Gerichtshof stellt übrigens fest, dass die Sache zu keinem Zeitpunkt von diesem Richter allein gewürdigt wurde, sondern einzig vom Plenum des Areopags (siehe im Wege des Gegenschlusses Procola ./. Luxemburg, Urteil vom 28. September 1995, Serie A Bd. 326, S. 16, Randnr. 45).
• EGMR, 08.01.2004 - 47169/99

  Überlange Dauer eines Verfassungsbeschwerde-Verfahrens

  Die Tatsache, dass das Verfahren vor dem Bundesgerichtshof im Sinne eines Rechtsstreits mit objektivem Charakter zu verstehen sei, bei dem es um die Nachprüfung eines Gesetzes ging, dürfte an dieser Feststellung grundsätzlich nichts ändern ( Procola ./. Luxemburg , Urteil vom 31, August 1995, Serie A Bd. 326, S. 14, Rdnr. 36-37), da die Beschwerdeführerin gerade in ihrem Fall behauptet hatte, dass das angefochtene Gesetz ihre nach dem Grundgesetz zugesicherten Grundrechte beeinträchtige (s. im Wege des Gegenschlusses die Rechtssache Giesinger ./. Österreich , Nr. 13062/87, Entscheidung der Kommission vom 29. Mai 1991, Entscheidungen und Berichte (DR, 70, 152).
• EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 62543/00

  GORRAIZ LIZARRAGA ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Cet aspect des recours revêtait indubitablement une dimension d'ordre « patrimonial'et civil, et se fondait sur une atteinte alléguée à des droits eux aussi patrimoniaux (Procola c. Luxembourg, arrêt du 28 septembre 1995, série A no 326, pp. 14-15, § 38).
• EGMR, 03.05.2001 - 39032/97

  SMITS, KLEYN, METTLER TOLEDO B.V. ET AL., RAYMAKERS, VERENIGING LANDELIJK OVERLEG …

  Mr and Mrs Raymakers cited the European Court's judgment of 28 September 1995 in the case of Procola v. Luxemburg (Series A no. 326).

  They refer in this respect to the Court's findings in its judgment of 28 September 1995 in the case of Procola v. Luxembourg (Series A no. 326).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 31.03.2009 - C-385/07

  Der Grüne Punkt - Duales System Deutschland / Kommission - Beherrschende Stellung …

  49 - Vgl. EGMR, Urteil Procola/Luxemburg vom 28. September 1995, Serie A Nr. 326.
• EGMR, 24.09.2002 - 27824/95

  POSTI AND RAHKO v. FINLAND

  Considering the terms of those leases - which were directly related to their occupation as professional fishermen - as well as the domestic case-law preceding the 1996 and the 1998 Decrees, the Court finds it established that up to the end of 1999 the applicants could arguably claim a "civil right" to fish for salmon and sea trout in the relevant waters to an extent exceeding the limits set out in the 1996 and the 1998 Decrees (see, for instance, Procola v. Luxembourg, judgment of 28 September 1995, Series A no. 326, pp. 13-15, §§ 34-40).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 65411/01

  SACILOR LORMINES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 12.04.2018 - 36661/07

  CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 57785/00

  ZLINSAT, SPOL. S R.O. v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 08.02.2000 - 28488/95

  McGONNELL c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 12.01.2021 - 50104/10

  SVILENGACANIN AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 25803/04

  HERRI BATASUNA ET BATASUNA c. ESPAGNE
• EGMR, 09.11.2004 - 61164/00

  BARBE et AUTRES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 50996/08

  HIT D.D. NOVA GORICA v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 13279/05

  NEJDET SAHIN AND PERIHAN SAHIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 06.03.2003 - 58811/00

  G.L. & S.L. contre la FRANCE
• EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 40242/12

  DI GREGORIO v. ITALY
• EGMR, 08.03.2011 - 8615/08

  ESCOFFIER c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 30.06.2009 - 39699/03

  UNION FEDERALE DES CONSOMMATEURS QUE CHOISIR DE COTE D'OR c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 22892/03

  BAKIYEVETS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 65411/01

  SACILOR-LORMINES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 47221/99

  PABLA KY c. FINLANDE
• EGMR, 12.06.2003 - 45681/99

  GUTFREUND c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 41290/98

  TAVEIRNE et VANCAUWENBERGHE contre la BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 67568/16

  CENTRE FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 33014/08

  RYON ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 30609/04

  VAILLANT c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 18.03.2003 - 48897/99

  S.A.R.L. DU PARC D'ACTIVITES DE BLOTZHEIM ET LA S.C.I. HASELAECKER contre la …
• EGMR, 25.04.2002 - 45681/99

  GUTFREUND contre la FRANCE
• EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 25130/94

  LIE AND BERNTSEN v. NORWAY
• EGMR, 08.06.1999 - 31993/96

  PREDIL ANSTALT S.A. contre l'ITALIE
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 34538/08

  GRENECHE ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 23.01.2007 - 41665/02

  RODOPLU c. TURQUIE
• EKMR, 26.02.1997 - 30300/96

  TALMON v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EKMR, 29.11.1995 - 21491/93

  BELEGGINGS- EN BEEHEERSMAATSCHAPPIJ INDIANA V.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS