Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ÖZTÜRK c. TURQUIE

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 34 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 10 Non-lieu à examiner P1-1 Dommage matériel - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ÖZTÜRK v. TURKEY

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 34 MRK
  Violation of Art. 10 Not necessary to examine P1-1 Pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 07.04.1997 - 22479/93
• EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93

Wird zitiert von ... (159)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23536/94

  Strafrechtliche Verfolgung auf Grund der Veröffentlichung eines Buches mit …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93

  On 11 December 1998 the President of the Court, Mr L. Wildhaber, decided that, in the interests of the proper administration of justice, the instant case should be referred to the Grand Chamber that had been constituted to hear thirteen other cases against Turkey, namely: Karatas v. Turkey (application no. 23168/94); Arslan v. Turkey (no. 23462/94); Polat v. Turkey (no. 23500/94); Ceylan v. Turkey (no. 23556/94); OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey (no. 24246/94); Gerger v. Turkey (no. 24919/94); ErdoÄ?du and Ä°nce v. Turkey (nos. 25067/94 and 25068/94); Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey (nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94); Sürek and Özdemir v. Turkey (nos. 23927/94 and 24277/94); Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) (no. 26682/95); Sürek v. Turkey (no. 2) (no. 24122/94); Sürek v. Turkey (no. 3) (no. 24735/94) and Sürek v. Turkey (no. 4) (no. 24762/94).

  However clearly drafted a legal provision may be, there will inevitably be a need for interpretation by the courts, whose judicial function is precisely to elucidate obscure points and dispel any doubts which may remain regarding the interpretation of legislation (see, mutatis mutandis, Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-IV, and Rekvényi cited above, loc. cit.).

• EKMR, 14.10.1996 - 24408/94

  OKÇUOGLU v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93

  On 11 December 1998 the President of the Court, Mr L. Wildhaber, decided that, in the interests of the proper administration of justice, the instant case should be referred to the Grand Chamber that had been constituted to hear thirteen other cases against Turkey, namely: Karatas v. Turkey (application no. 23168/94); Arslan v. Turkey (no. 23462/94); Polat v. Turkey (no. 23500/94); Ceylan v. Turkey (no. 23556/94); OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey (no. 24246/94); Gerger v. Turkey (no. 24919/94); ErdoÄ?du and Ä°nce v. Turkey (nos. 25067/94 and 25068/94); Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey (nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94); Sürek and Özdemir v. Turkey (nos. 23927/94 and 24277/94); Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) (no. 26682/95); Sürek v. Turkey (no. 2) (no. 24122/94); Sürek v. Turkey (no. 3) (no. 24735/94) and Sürek v. Turkey (no. 4) (no. 24762/94).

  However clearly drafted a legal provision may be, there will inevitably be a need for interpretation by the courts, whose judicial function is precisely to elucidate obscure points and dispel any doubts which may remain regarding the interpretation of legislation (see, mutatis mutandis, Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-IV, and Rekvényi cited above, loc. cit.).

• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23556/94

  CEYLAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93

  On 11 December 1998 the President of the Court, Mr L. Wildhaber, decided that, in the interests of the proper administration of justice, the instant case should be referred to the Grand Chamber that had been constituted to hear thirteen other cases against Turkey, namely: Karatas v. Turkey (application no. 23168/94); Arslan v. Turkey (no. 23462/94); Polat v. Turkey (no. 23500/94); Ceylan v. Turkey (no. 23556/94); OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey (no. 24246/94); Gerger v. Turkey (no. 24919/94); ErdoÄ?du and Ä°nce v. Turkey (nos. 25067/94 and 25068/94); Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey (nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94); Sürek and Özdemir v. Turkey (nos. 23927/94 and 24277/94); Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) (no. 26682/95); Sürek v. Turkey (no. 2) (no. 24122/94); Sürek v. Turkey (no. 3) (no. 24735/94) and Sürek v. Turkey (no. 4) (no. 24762/94).

  In short, the Court, like the Commission, accepts that the interference with the applicant's right to freedom of expression, being the result of his conviction under Article 312 § 2 of the Criminal Code, may be considered to have been prescribed by law (see, mutatis mutandis, the following judgments: Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 25, ECHR 1999-IV; Incal v. Turkey of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-IV, pp. 1564-65, § 41; and Zana v. Turkey of 25 November 1997, Reports 1997-VII, p. 2546, § 47).

 
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23168/94

  KARATAS c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93

  On 11 December 1998 the President of the Court, Mr L. Wildhaber, decided that, in the interests of the proper administration of justice, the instant case should be referred to the Grand Chamber that had been constituted to hear thirteen other cases against Turkey, namely: Karatas v. Turkey (application no. 23168/94); Arslan v. Turkey (no. 23462/94); Polat v. Turkey (no. 23500/94); Ceylan v. Turkey (no. 23556/94); OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey (no. 24246/94); Gerger v. Turkey (no. 24919/94); ErdoÄ?du and Ä°nce v. Turkey (nos. 25067/94 and 25068/94); Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey (nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94); Sürek and Özdemir v. Turkey (nos. 23927/94 and 24277/94); Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) (no. 26682/95); Sürek v. Turkey (no. 2) (no. 24122/94); Sürek v. Turkey (no. 3) (no. 24735/94) and Sürek v. Turkey (no. 4) (no. 24762/94).

  The Court reiterates the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 10, as set out most recently in thirteen other cases against Turkey (see paragraph 4 above and, among other authorities, Karatas v. Turkey [GC], no. 23168/94, § 48, ECHR 1999-IV).

• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 26682/95

  SÜREK c. TURQUIE (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93

  On 11 December 1998 the President of the Court, Mr L. Wildhaber, decided that, in the interests of the proper administration of justice, the instant case should be referred to the Grand Chamber that had been constituted to hear thirteen other cases against Turkey, namely: Karatas v. Turkey (application no. 23168/94); Arslan v. Turkey (no. 23462/94); Polat v. Turkey (no. 23500/94); Ceylan v. Turkey (no. 23556/94); OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey (no. 24246/94); Gerger v. Turkey (no. 24919/94); ErdoÄ?du and Ä°nce v. Turkey (nos. 25067/94 and 25068/94); Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey (nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94); Sürek and Özdemir v. Turkey (nos. 23927/94 and 24277/94); Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) (no. 26682/95); Sürek v. Turkey (no. 2) (no. 24122/94); Sürek v. Turkey (no. 3) (no. 24735/94) and Sürek v. Turkey (no. 4) (no. 24762/94).

  However, by providing authors with a medium they participate in the exercise of the freedom of expression, just as they are vicariously subject to the "duties and responsibilities" which authors take on when they disseminate their opinions to the public (see, mutatis mutandis, Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 63, ECHR 1999-IV; see also paragraph 31 above).

• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 25390/94

  REKVÉNYI c. HONGRIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93

  Accordingly, many laws are inevitably couched in terms which, to a greater or lesser extent, are vague and whose interpretation and application are questions of practice (see Rekvényi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89

  CASADO COCA v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93

  No distinction is made in it according to the nature of the aim pursued or the role played by natural or legal persons in the exercise of that freedom (see, mutatis mutandis, the Casado Coca v. Spain judgment of 24 February 1994, Series A no. 285-A, pp. 16-17, § 35).
• EGMR, 24.05.1988 - 10737/84

  MÜLLER AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93

  In short, the Court considers that Mr Öztürk's conviction for helping to publish and distribute Mr Behram's book unquestionably constituted interference with the exercise of his freedom of expression under the first paragraph of Article 10 (see, mutatis mutandis, the Engel and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 40, §§ 94-95, and the Müller and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 19, §§ 27-28).
• EGMR, 22.05.1990 - 12726/87

  AUTRONIC AG v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93

  It applies not only to the content of information but also to the means of dissemination, since any restriction imposed on the means necessarily interferes with the right to receive and impart information (see, mutatis mutandis, the Autronic AG v. Switzerland judgment of 22 May 1990, Series A no. 178, p. 23, § 47).

• EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 27510/08

  Leugnung des Völkermords an Armeniern von Meinungsfreiheit gedeckt

  In its subsequent case-law under Article 10 § 2, the Court has, with minor variations in the formulation, consistently adhered to this position (see, among other authorities, Rekvényi, cited above, § 34; Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 54, ECHR 1999-VI; and Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 16.04.2024 - 40519/15

  BORISLAV TONCHEV v. BULGARIA

  Non-exhaustion of domestic remedies cannot be held against an applicant if, despite his or her failure to bring the case before the competent national court in line with the relevant procedural requirements, that court has examined the substance of his or her complaint (see, among other authorities, Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, §§ 45-46, ECHR 1999-VI; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 143, ECHR 2010; and Savickis and Others, cited above, §§ 140 and 152).
• EuG, 27.07.2022 - T-125/22

  Auswärtige Beziehungen

  Der EGMR hat bereits entschieden, dass die Freiheit der Meinungsäußerung eine der wesentlichen Grundlagen einer demokratischen Gesellschaft bildet und dass in Art. 10 der EMRK weder anhand des angestrebten Zwecks unterschieden wird noch anhand der Rolle, die natürliche oder juristische Personen bei der Ausübung dieser Freiheit gespielt haben (EGMR, 28. September 1999, Öztürk/Türkei, CE:ECHR:1999:0928JUD002247993, § 49).

 
• EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 29731/96

  Dieter Krombach

  As regards the fees incurred in the proceedings before the Commission and the Court, the Court has assessed the claim in the light of the principles established in its case-law (see Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 79, ECHR 1999-II; Oztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 83, ECHR 1999-VI; and Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629/95, § 88, ECHR 2000-III).
• EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 40397/12

  NEIJ AND SUNDE KOLMISOPPI v. SWEDEN

  En outre, l'article 10 concerne non seulement le contenu des informations mais aussi les moyens de transmission ou de captage, car toute restriction apportée à ceux-ci touche le droit de recevoir et de communiquer des informations (voir, par exemple, Öztürk c. Turquie [GC], no 22479/93, § 49, CEDH 1999-VI).
• EGMR, 04.04.2000 - 26629/95

  WITOLD LITWA c. POLOGNE

  The Court observes that, according to the criteria laid down in its case-law, it must ascertain whether the sum claimed was actually and necessarily incurred and was reasonable as to quantum (see, among other authorities, Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 83, ECHR 1999-VI).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 26.11.2013 - C-314/12

  Nach Ansicht von Generalanwalt Pedro Cruz Villalón kann einem Internetprovider …

  47- Vgl. EGMR, Urteil Öztürk gegen Türkei vom 28. September 1999, Beschwerde Nr. 22479/93, Slg. 1999-VI, § 49.
• EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 78028/01

  PINI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  The Court has assessed the claims in the light of the principles set forth in its case-law (see Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 79, ECHR 1999-II; Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 83, ECHR 1999-VI; and Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629/95, § 88, ECHR 2000-III).
• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 28358/95

  BARANOWSKI v. POLAND

  Applying the criteria laid down in its case-law (see, for instance, Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 83, ECHR 1999-VI) and making its assessment on an equitable basis, the Court considers it reasonable to award the applicant PLN 10, 000 for his costs and expenses, together with any value-added tax that may be chargeable.
• EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 931/13

  Keine Verletzung des Rechts auf Meinungsäußerung durch Verbot der …

  I agree with Judge Nicolaou's view, as expressed in his concurring opinion, that they were not sanctions as such (contrast and compare with Weber v. Switzerland, 22 May 1990, § 33, Series A no. 177; Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 66, ECHR 1999-VI; and Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no. 23144/93, § 69, ECHR 2000-III).
• EGMR, 10.07.2003 - 44179/98

  MURPHY v. IRELAND
• EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 32401/10

  TAGANROG LRO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 9858/04

  MEHMET HATIP DICLE c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 62677/00

  SAYGILI ET SEYMAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 10054/03

  EMIR c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 43996/98

  KÜRKÇÜ c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 13.07.2004 - 26971/95

  ZARAKOLU ET BELGE ULUSLARARASI YAYINCILIK c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 20863/02

  AKTAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 20.01.2020 - 201/17

  MAGYAR KÉTFARKÚ KUTYA PÁRT v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 25.07.2002 - 54210/00

  Maurice Papon
• EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 201/17

  MAGYAR KÉTFARKÚ KUTYA PÁRT v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 43453/04

  GÖZEL ET ÖZER c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 5869/17

  ERKIZIA ALMANDOZ c. ESPAGNE
• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 20985/05

  ORBAN ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 28.08.2018 - 10692/09

  SAVVA TERENTYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 44227/04

  BELEK ET VELIOGLU c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 27.05.2004 - 25143/94

  YURTTAS c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 34805/06

  T.Ç. ET H.Ç.c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 09.05.2018 - 52273/07

  STOMAKHIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.05.2009 - 35721/04

  ÖZER c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 18642/04

  SMATANA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
• EGMR, 23.07.2009 - 30345/05

  JOUBERT c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 43453/04

  ARSLAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 27.11.2003 - 45355/99

  SHAMSA c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 15.06.2000 - 25723/94

  ERDOGDU c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 23018/04

  URCAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 16.06.2009 - 33340/03

  BAHÇECI ET TURAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 11.10.2001 - 50841/99

  OSMANI AND OTHERS v.
• EuG, 14.07.2021 - T-248/18

  Cabello Rondón/ Rat - Gemeinsame Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik - Restriktive …
• EGMR, 03.10.2017 - 42168/06

  DMITRIYEVSKIY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.12.2006 - 77650/01

  ERDAL TAS c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 47533/99

  ERGIN c. TURQUIE (N° 6)
• EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 34520/97

  ALINAK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 15.10.2002 - 24914/94

  AYSE ÖZTÜRK c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 18.05.2021 - 43351/12

  OOO INFORMATSIONNOYE AGENTSTVO TAMBOV-INFORM v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 3224/03

  TURAN BIÇER c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 16.02.2010 - 41056/04

  AKDAS c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 26258/07

  RAI ET EVANS c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 22943/04

  SAIME ÖZCAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 13799/04

  KANAT ET BOZAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 11424/03

  KARAKAYA c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 9043/03

  TAYFUN YAYAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 48098/99

  MEHMET OKÇUOGLU c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 23.01.2007 - 16229/03

  FALAKAOGLU c. TURQUIE (N° 3)
• EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 50087/99

  MÜSLÜM ÖZBEY c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 19.12.2006 - 77642/01

  YILDIZ ET TAS c. TURQUIE (N° 2)
• EGMR, 19.12.2006 - 3847/02

  YILDIZ ET TAS c. TURQUIE (N° 4)
• EGMR, 19.12.2006 - 77641/01

  YILDIZ ET TAS c. TURQUIE (N° 1)
• EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 68234/01

  BASKAYA c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 74341/01

  KARAHANOGLU c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 25.07.2006 - 71978/01

  ÇAPAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 27.04.2006 - 57299/00

  VARLI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 11.04.2006 - 62230/00

  SEVGI YILMAZ c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 53919/00

  REFIK KARAKOÇ c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 20.12.2005 - 42779/98

  ÇETIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 20.12.2005 - 40987/98

  KORKMAZ c. TURQUIE (N° 1)
• EGMR, 20.12.2005 - 42590/98

  KORKMAZ c. TURQUIE (N° 3)
• EGMR, 06.12.2005 - 42605/98

  FIKRET SAHIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 07.06.2005 - 39708/98

  PAMAK c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 50744/99

  TESLIM TÖRE c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 10.05.2005 - 60261/00

  CALISLAR c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 63739/00

  AYDIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 47579/99

  RAICHINOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 13.01.2005 - 36215/97

  DAGTEKIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 09.12.2004 - 40985/98

  ELDEN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 42119/98

  ÖZKAYA c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 10.11.2004 - 48988/99

  BARAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 10.11.2004 - 49059/99

  AYHAN c. TURQUIE (N° 2)
• EGMR, 10.11.2004 - 45585/99

  AYHAN c. TURQUIE (N° 1)
• EGMR, 10.11.2004 - 41618/98

  ODABASI c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 38586/97

  VARLI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 23.09.2004 - 42713/98

  FERIDUN YAZAR ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 43995/98

  OKUTAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 57250/00

  IPRAHIM ÜLGER c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 15.07.2004 - 42920/98

  HAYDAR YILDIRIM ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 02.12.2010 - 30856/03

  KRYVITSKA AND KRYVITSKYY v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 36141/04

  BINGÖL c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 13304/03

  SAVGIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 26.01.2010 - 871/08

  ÖZER c. TURQUIE (N° 2)
• EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 34740/03

  BOZLAK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 25008/05

  MOROIANU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 5290/02

  UNAY c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 984/02

  BURAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 04.03.2008 - 9844/02

  KIZILYAPRAK (N° 2) c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 47520/99

  AKiN BIRDAL c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02

  DEMIREL AND ATES v. TURKEY (N°2)
• EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 42212/04

  ISAR c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 28183/03

  ANGHEL c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 6586/05

  GÜZEL c. TURQUIE (n° 3)
• EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 65344/01

  ONARAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 26.04.2007 - 16891/02

  FUNKE c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 26.04.2007 - 29849/02

  ÇAPAN c. TURQUIE (N° 2)
• EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 54461/00

  SOYSAL ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 66400/01

  TAPKAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 25.07.2006 - 71984/01

  HALIS DOGAN c. TURQUIE (N° 2)
• EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 75569/01

  ÇETINKAYA c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 71355/01

  DENIZ c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 30.03.2006 - 17445/02

  TAS c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 24.01.2006 - 56566/00

  YASAR KAPLAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 48387/99

  HAYDAR KAYA c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 46454/99

  CEYLAN c. TURQUIE (N°2)
• EGMR, 20.09.2005 - 62230/00

  YILMAZ c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 48944/99

  ERGIN c. TURQUIE (N° 1)
• EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 49566/99

  ERGIN c. TURQUIE (N° 2)
• EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 63925/00

  ERGIN c. TURQUIE (N° 5)
• EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 63733/00

  ERGIN c. TURQUIE (N° 4)
• EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 50273/99

  ERGIN ET KESKIN c. TURQUIE (N° 1)
• EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 50691/99

  ERGIN c. TURQUIE (N° 3)
• EGMR, 29.03.2005 - 46069/99

  AGIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 15.03.2005 - 43974/98

  BULGA ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 25.01.2005 - 60538/00

  SINGH c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
• EGMR, 09.11.2004 - 40077/98

  MARASLI v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 01.06.2004 - 55391/00

  ÖZCELIK et AUTRES contre la TURQUIE
• EGMR, 13.05.2004 - 53916/00

  GUNES contre la TURQUIE
• EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 49564/99

  KESKIN contre la TURQUIE
• EGMR, 09.10.2003 - 49059/99

  AYHAN contre la TURQUIE
• EGMR, 13.03.2003 - 77642/01

  YILDIZ et TAS contre la TURQUIE
• EGMR, 13.03.2003 - 3847/02

  YILDIZ et TAS contre la TURQUIE
• EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 15360/05

  HASAN COSKUN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 1758/02

  KAZAKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 29765/02

  BARISIK AND ALP v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 53047/99

  BIRDAL v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 30160/04

  DZHAVADOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.09.2007 - 57103/00

  ÇETIN ET SAKAR c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 19.12.2006 - 477/02

  YILDIZ ET TAS c. TURQUIE (N° 3)
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 56827/00

  DUZGOREN v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 18.07.2006 - 1993/02

  BALSAN c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
• EGMR, 22.12.2005 - 64609/01

  ÇAMLIBEL c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 20.12.2005 - 42589/98

  KORKMAZ c. TURQUIE (N° 2)
• EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 49564/99

  KESKIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 60262/00

  DEMIR c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 54916/00

  BAKIR c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 50997/99

  HAN v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 21.06.2005 - 46669/99

  PERINÇEK c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 15.03.2005 - 40303/98

  GUMUS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 44104/98

  BIROL c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 11.01.2005 - 30007/96

  HALIS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 10.11.2004 - 34685/97

  DICLE v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 18.12.2003 - 63000/00

  SKONDRIANOS c. GRECE
• EGMR, 05.12.2002 - 28493/95

  YALÇIN KÜÇÜK c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 22.04.2008 - 71353/01

  YALCIN KÜÇÜK (NO. 3) c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 18.03.2008 - 36370/02

  PIROGLU AND KARAKAYA v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 70335/01

  YURDATAPAN v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 28582/02

  ASAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 11.04.2006 - 46733/99

  DICLE c. TURQUIE (N° 2)
• EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 63926/00

  ERGIN ET KESKIN c. TURQUIE (NO. 2)
• EGMR, 14.06.2005 - 20868/02

  TURAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 15.03.2005 - 43672/98

  ERTAS AYDIN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 19.12.2002 - 58115/00

  CULJAK AND OTHERS v. CROATIA