Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ISAAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 1, Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Admissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 44587/98
• EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 44587/98

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 12.12.2001 - 52207/99

  V. und B. B., Ž. S., M. S., D. J. und D. S. gegen Belgien, Dänemark, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 44587/98

  Furthermore, the words "within their jurisdiction" in Article 1 of the Convention must be understood to mean that a State's jurisdictional competence is primarily territorial (see Bankovic and Others v. Belgium and 16 Other Contracting States (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, § 59, ECHR 2001-XII).
• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 48787/99

  Transnistrien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 44587/98

  The exercise of jurisdiction is a necessary condition for a Contracting State to be able to be held responsible for acts or omissions imputable to it which give rise to an allegation of the infringement of rights and freedoms set forth in the Convention (see Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia, [GC], no. 48787/99, § 311, ECHR 2004-VII).
• EGMR, 15.09.2005 - 69481/01

  BAZORKINA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 44587/98

  Indeed, the Convention organs have declared admissible applications from relatives of the deceased where similar complaints have been raised under these provisions and emanated from the death (see, inter alia, Ergi v. Turkey, no. 23818/94, Commission decision of 2 March 1995, unreported; Kakoulli v. Turkey, decision of 4 September 2001, no. 38595/97 and Bazorkina v. Russia decision of 15 September 2005, no. 69481/01).

 
• EGMR, 04.09.2001 - 38595/97

  KAKOULLI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 44587/98

  Indeed, the Convention organs have declared admissible applications from relatives of the deceased where similar complaints have been raised under these provisions and emanated from the death (see, inter alia, Ergi v. Turkey, no. 23818/94, Commission decision of 2 March 1995, unreported; Kakoulli v. Turkey, decision of 4 September 2001, no. 38595/97 and Bazorkina v. Russia decision of 15 September 2005, no. 69481/01).
• EGMR, 23.03.1995 - 15318/89

  LOIZIDOU c. TURQUIE (EXCEPTIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 44587/98

  The applicants contested the Government's submissions, relying essentially on the reasons given by the Court for rejecting similar objections raised by Turkey in its judgments in the case of Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections and merits) (judgments of 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310, pp. 23-24, §§ 62-64 and 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI, p. 2216, §§ 52-57) and of the Commission's decision in the case of Cyprus v. Turkey (no. 25781/94, Commission decision of 28 June 1996, (DR) 86-A, p. 104).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 44587/98

  The applicants relied on a number of cases in this respect, including McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324), Andronicou and Constantinou v. Cyprus (judgment of 9 October 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI), Kaya v. Turkey (judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I) and Yasa v. Turkey (judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI).