Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.09.2010 - 4488/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,60158) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
E.M.B. v. ROMANIA
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 8, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2,... Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 3, Protokoll Nr. 12 Art. 1 MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 28.09.2010 - 4488/03
- EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 4488/03
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76
GUZZARDI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2010 - 4488/03
In this respect, it reiterates that in proclaiming the "right to liberty", Article 5 § 1 of the Convention is contemplating the physical liberty of the person; its aim is to ensure that no one should be dispossessed of this liberty in an arbitrary fashion (see Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 92, Series A no. 39). - EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2010 - 4488/03
Being the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1990, § 29, Series A no. 172, and Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, § 44, Reports 1998-I), the Court considers that these complaints fall to be examined under Article 5 §§ 2 and 4 of the Convention. - EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88
Jens Söring
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2010 - 4488/03
The Court reiterates that it accepted the notion of a potential victim in the following cases: where the applicant was not in a position to demonstrate that the legislation he complained of had actually been applied to him because of the secret nature of the measures it authorised (see Klass and Others v. Germany, §§ 33, 6 September 1978); where a law punishing homosexual acts was likely to be applied to a certain category of the population, to which the applicant belonged (see Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45); and lastly where the forced removal of aliens had already been decided on but not yet carried out and enforcement of the measure would have exposed the persons concerned to the risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 in the country of destination (see Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161) or would have infringed the right to respect for family life (see Beldjoudi v. France, 26 March 1992, Series A no. 234). - EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76
DUDGEON c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2010 - 4488/03
The Court reiterates that it accepted the notion of a potential victim in the following cases: where the applicant was not in a position to demonstrate that the legislation he complained of had actually been applied to him because of the secret nature of the measures it authorised (see Klass and Others v. Germany, §§ 33, 6 September 1978); where a law punishing homosexual acts was likely to be applied to a certain category of the population, to which the applicant belonged (see Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45); and lastly where the forced removal of aliens had already been decided on but not yet carried out and enforcement of the measure would have exposed the persons concerned to the risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 in the country of destination (see Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161) or would have infringed the right to respect for family life (see Beldjoudi v. France, 26 March 1992, Series A no. 234).