Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.10.1992 - 12351/86 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1992,13445) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE (ARTICLE 50)
Art. 41 MRK
Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure nationale Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VIDAL v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50)
Art. 41 MRK
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 14.05.1990 - 12351/86
- EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
- EGMR, 28.10.1992 - 12351/86
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.1992 - 12351/86
For the facts of the case reference should be made to the principal judgment of 22 April 1992 (Series A no. 235-B, pp. 21-30, paras. 7-27).[ï?ª] The case is numbered 14/1991/266/337.
- EGMR, 19.12.1990 - 11444/85
DELTA c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.1992 - 12351/86
On the other hand, the applicant suffered non-pecuniary damage (see paragraph 7 (a) (vi)) and it appears not unreasonable to regard him as also having suffered a loss of real opportunities (see, among other authorities and mutatis mutandis, the Delta v. France judgment of 19 December 1990, Series A no. 191-A, pp. 17-18, para. 43). - EGMR, 14.09.1987 - 9186/80
DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50)
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.1992 - 12351/86
These showed among other things that the applicant and the Government had been unable to agree on a figure and that recourse had not been had to Article 441 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (cf. the Piersack v. Belgium judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 85, pp. 13-15, paras. 5-6, and the De Cubber v. Belgium judgment of 14 September 1987, Series A no. 124-B, pp. 14-15, paras. 5-7).