Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LEONID LAZARENKO v. UKRAINE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6-1 and 6-3 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 26103/95

  VAN GEYSEGHEM c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 22313/04

  The Court reiterates that the requirements of paragraph 3 of Article 6 are to be seen as particular aspects of the right to a fair trial guaranteed by paragraph 1 of that Article and thus they are to be examined together (see Van Geyseghem v. Belgium [GC], no. 26103/95, § 27, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 28135/95

  MAGEE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 22313/04

  At the same time, it notes that the deprivation of the applicant of legal assistance and the use of incriminating statements he made during that period for his conviction are sufficient indications of a breach of the fair-trial guarantees (see Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135/95, § 45, ECHR 2000-VI).
• EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 29731/96

  Dieter Krombach

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 22313/04

  The Court emphasises that, although not absolute, the right of everyone charged with a criminal offence to be effectively defended by a lawyer, assigned officially if need be, is one of the fundamental features of fair trial (see Krombach v. France, no. 29731/96, § 89, ECHR 2001-II).

 
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 22313/04

  The right not to incriminate oneself, in particular, presupposes that the prosecution in a criminal case seek to prove their case against the accused without resort to evidence obtained through methods of coercion or oppression in defiance of the will of the accused (see Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 100, ECHR 2006-IX, with further references).
• EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 4378/02

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (heimliche Ermittlungsmethoden; Umgehungsverbot; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 22313/04

  They also contribute to the prevention of miscarriages of justice and to the fulfilment of the aims of Article 6, notably equality of arms between the investigating or prosecuting authorities and the accused (see Salduz, cited above, § 53, Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 92, ECHR 2009-..., with further references, and Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025/04, § 68, 24 September 2009).
• EGMR, 24.09.2009 - 7025/04

  PISHCHALNIKOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 22313/04

  They also contribute to the prevention of miscarriages of justice and to the fulfilment of the aims of Article 6, notably equality of arms between the investigating or prosecuting authorities and the accused (see Salduz, cited above, § 53, Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 92, ECHR 2009-..., with further references, and Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025/04, § 68, 24 September 2009).

• EGMR, 31.05.2022 - 4315/18

  RIGO v. SLOVAKIA

  No objection has been advanced at the domestic level or before the Court as to the validity of this waiver, which the Court for its part has found no reason to doubt (for contrast see Zachar and Cierny v. Slovakia, nos. 29376/12 and 29384/12, §§ 72-74, 21 July 2015, and Leonid Lazarenko v. Ukraine, no. 22313/04, § 56, 28 October 2010).
• EGMR, 12.01.2012 - 16717/05

  TODOROV v. UKRAINE

  Examining the facts of the present case in light of the principles developed in its case-law (see, for example, Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, § 55, ECHR 2008 and Leonid Lazarenko v. Ukraine, no. 22313/04, §§ 49, 28 October 2010), the Court reiterates that access to a lawyer should be provided as from the first interrogation of a suspect by the police, unless it is demonstrated in the light of the particular circumstances of each case that there are compelling reasons to restrict this right.
• EGMR - 29384/12 (anhängig)

  CIERNY v. SLOVAKIA

  In particular, was there a violation of his right not to incriminate himself (see Leonid Lazarenko v. Ukraine, no. 22313/04, 28 October 2010)?.