Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 5339/07

The six-month rule marks out the temporal limits of supervision carried out by the Convention organs and signals to both individuals and State authorities the period beyond which such supervision is no longer possible (see Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I).

Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 5339/07

The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).

Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 5339/07

Even though the Court appreciates the efforts made by the Administrative Court to deal with its case-load expeditiously, it would reiterate that it is for Contracting States to organise their legal systems in such a way that their courts can guarantee the right of everyone to obtain a final decision on disputes within a reasonable time (see, for instance, Almesberger v. Austria, no. 13471/06, § 27, 10 December 2009, and Otto v. Austria, no. 12702/08, § 24, 22 October 2009).

Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 5339/07

Even though the Court appreciates the efforts made by the Administrative Court to deal with its case-load expeditiously, it would reiterate that it is for Contracting States to organise their legal systems in such a way that their courts can guarantee the right of everyone to obtain a final decision on disputes within a reasonable time (see, for instance, Almesberger v. Austria, no. 13471/06, § 27, 10 December 2009, and Otto v. Austria, no. 12702/08, § 24, 22 October 2009).

Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 5339/07

11/04/2011.