Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,31612) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ION CÂRSTEA v. ROMANIA
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06
- EGMR, 04.11.2015 - 20531/06
- EGMR - 20531/06
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 46468/99
MANOUSSOS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06
In addition, persistent use of insulting or provocative language by an applicant may be considered an abuse of the right of application within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention (see Manoussos v. the Czech Republic and Germany (dec.), no. 46468/99, 9 July 2002; Duringer and Others v. France (dec.), nos. - EGMR, 12.09.2011 - 28955/06
PALOMO SÁNCHEZ ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06
The Court reiterates that where the balancing exercise has been undertaken by the national authorities in conformity with the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, the Court would require strong reasons to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts (see MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, §§ 150 and 155, 18 January 2011; Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06, 28957/06, 28959/06, 28964/06, § 57, 12 September 2011; and Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. - EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08
Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06
40660/08 and 60641/08, § 107, ECHR 2012). - EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 61164/00
DURINGER et AUTRES et GRUNGE contre la FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06
61164/00 and 18589/02; and Stamoulakatos v. the United Kingdom, no. 27567/95, Commission decision of 9 April 1997). - EGMR, 13.11.2019 - 39401/04
MGN LIMITED AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06
The Court reiterates that where the balancing exercise has been undertaken by the national authorities in conformity with the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, the Court would require strong reasons to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts (see MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, §§ 150 and 155, 18 January 2011; Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06, 28957/06, 28959/06, 28964/06, § 57, 12 September 2011; and Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos.