Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CAVANI v. HUNGARY

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Cavani v. Hungary

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  CAVANI AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90

  KEEGAN v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 5493/13

  In both contexts regard must be had to the fair balance that has to be struck between the competing interests of the individual and of the community as a whole; and in both contexts the State enjoys a certain margin of appreciation (see Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 49, Series A no. 290).
• EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 6457/09

  SHAW v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 5493/13

  In proceedings under the EU Regulation on Recognition of Judgments this is likewise so, as Article 11 § 3 requires the judicial authorities concerned to act expeditiously, using the most prompt procedures available in domestic law, and issue a judgment no later than six weeks after the application is lodged (Shaw v. Hungary, no. 6457/09, § 66, 26 July 2011).
• EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96

  Schießbefehl

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 5493/13

  Lastly, the Court reiterates that the Convention must be applied in accordance with the principles of international law, in particular with those relating to the international protection of human rights (see Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 90, ECHR 2001-II; Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, § 55, ECHR 2001-XI ; and X v. Latvia [GC], no. 27853/09, §§ 93 and 94, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 32842/96

  NUUTINEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 5493/13

  In relation to the State's obligation to take positive measures, the Court has repeatedly held that Article 8 includes a parent's right to the taking of measures with a view to his being reunited with his child and an obligation on the national authorities to facilitate such reunion (see, among other authorities, Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-I, and Iglesias Gil and A.U.I. v. Spain, no. 56673/00, § 49, ECHR 2003-V; see also Nuutinen v. Finland, no. 32842/96, § 127, ECHR 2000-VIII).

• EGMR, 24.04.2018 - 46524/14

  TONELLO v. HUNGARY

  The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction read as follows (see Cavani v. Hungary, no. 5493/13, § 33, 28 October 2014, and A. v. Austria, no. 4097/13, § 67, 15 January 2015):.

  Consequently, the Court considers that the positive obligations that Article 8 of the Convention lays on the Contracting States in the matter of reuniting a parent with his or her children must be interpreted, in the present case, in the light of the Hague Convention and the EU Regulation on Recognition of Judgments (see Ignaccolo-Zenide, cited above, § 95, and Cavani v. Hungary, no. 5493/13, § 53, 28 October 2014).

• EGMR, 08.06.2023 - 44684/14

  P.N. c. RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE

  En tout état de cause, la Cour rappelle que le caractère adéquat d'une mesure se juge à la rapidité de sa mise en ?“uvre, car le passage du temps peut avoir des conséquences irrémédiables sur les relations entre l'enfant et le parent qui ne vit pas avec lui (Cavani c. Hongrie, no 5493/13, § 51, 28 octobre 2014, et M.A. c. Autriche, précité, § 109).