Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.11.1997 - 23186/94 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MENTES ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 6, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 18, Art. 26 MRK
Violation de l'art. 8 Violation de l'art. 13 Non-violation de l'art. 2 Non-violation de l'art. 3 Non-violation de l'art. 5 Non-violation de l'art. 6 Non-violation de l'art. 8 Non-violation de l'art. 13 Non-violation de l'art. 14 Non-violation de l'art. 18 ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MENTES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 6, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 18, Art. 26, Art. 2 MRK
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion) Not necessary to examine Art. 5 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14 No violation of Art. 18 No violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 5 No violation of ... - Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte
(englisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 23186/94
- EGMR, 28.11.1997 - 23186/94
- EGMR, 24.07.1998 - 23186/94
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76
VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.1997 - 23186/94
The Strasbourg review plays a role only as a system for dispute settlement that operates once all effective domestic remedies have been exhausted and the respondent State has been afforded a proper opportunity to put right the matter complained of under the Convention (Article 26) (see, amongst other authorities, the Handyside v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 22, § 48; and the Van Oosterwijk v. Belgium judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40, p. 17, § 34). - EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72
HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.1997 - 23186/94
The Strasbourg review plays a role only as a system for dispute settlement that operates once all effective domestic remedies have been exhausted and the respondent State has been afforded a proper opportunity to put right the matter complained of under the Convention (Article 26) (see, amongst other authorities, the Handyside v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 22, § 48; and the Van Oosterwijk v. Belgium judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40, p. 17, § 34).