Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 13893/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,59134) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 71152/01
BARSZCZ v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 13893/02
The legal provisions applicable at the material time as well as matters of practice concerning the remedies against unreasonable length of proceedings are set out in paragraphs 26-35 of the judgment delivered by the Court on 30 May 2006 in the case of Barszcz v. Poland, no. 71152/01.The Court notes that the arguments raised by the Government are the same as those already examined and rejected by the Court in previous cases against Poland (see Malasiewicz v. Poland, no. 22072/02, §§ 32-34, 14 October 2003; Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005-...; Barszcz v. Poland, no. 71152/01, §§ 41-45, 30 May 2006) and the Government have not submitted any new arguments which would lead the Court to depart from its previous findings.
- EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 13893/02
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II). - EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 25067/94
ERDOGDU ET INCE c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 13893/02
25067/94 and 25068/94, § 30, ECHR 1999-IV). - EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 13893/02
In any event, the Court also points out that the requirements of the six-months" rule are complied with if the first communication has been made within the time-limit, although it may have arrived several days after its expiry (see Angelova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 38361/97, 6 June 2000, and Erdogdu and Ince v. Turkey [GC], nos. - EGMR, 14.10.2003 - 22072/02
MALASIEWICZ v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 13893/02
The Court notes that the arguments raised by the Government are the same as those already examined and rejected by the Court in previous cases against Poland (see Malasiewicz v. Poland, no. 22072/02, §§ 32-34, 14 October 2003; Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005-...; Barszcz v. Poland, no. 71152/01, §§ 41-45, 30 May 2006) and the Government have not submitted any new arguments which would lead the Court to depart from its previous findings.