Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KORMACHEVA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 53084/99
• EGMR, 29.01.2004 - 53084/99
• EGMR, 07.06.2017 - 53084/99

Wird zitiert von ... (9)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2004 - 53084/99

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the criteria established by its case-law, particularly the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2004 - 53084/99

  The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 28.06.1990 - 11761/85

  Obermeier ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2004 - 53084/99

  The Court recalls further that employment disputes by their nature call for expeditious decision (see, mutatis mutandis, Obermeier v. Austria, judgment of 28 June 1990, Series A no. 179, § 72).

• EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01

  Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …

  In der Folge hat der Gerichtshof Rechtsbehelfe gegen die Verfahrensdauer in einigen Mitgliedstaaten auf ihre Wirksamkeit i.S. von Art. 13 EMRK genauer überprüft (s. u.a. EGMR, Entsch. v. 2.10.2001 - 42320/98 - Belinger/Slowenien, unveröff.; EGMR, Slg. 2002-IX - Andrasik u.a./Slowakei; EGMR, Slg. 2002-VII - Slavicek/Kroatien; EGMR, Slg. 2002-IX - Fernandez-Molina Gonzalez u.a./Spanien; EGMR, Slg. 2003-X - Doran/Irland; EGMR, Slg. 2003-VIII - Hartman/Tschechien; EGMR, Slg. 2003-VIII - Paulino Tomas/Portugal; EGMR, Entsch. v. 29.1. 2004 - 53084/99 - Kormatcheva/Russland, unveröff; EGMR, Entsch. v. 15.3. 2005 - 60227/00 - Bako/Slowakei, unveröff.; EGMR, Slg. 2005-V - Charzynski/Polen; EGMR, Slg. 2005-X - Lukenda/Slowenien).
• EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 1603/02

  BROVCHENKO v. RUSSIA

  It notes that the Government did not indicate any concrete remedy that could have expedited the determination of the applicant's case or provided him with adequate redress for delays that had already occurred (see Kormacheva v. Russia, no. 53084/99, § 64, 29 January 2004).
• EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 2355/06

  KARPENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Firstly, the Court has on numerous occasions determined issues analogous to those arising in the instant cases and ascertained in great detail the States" obligations under the Convention in that respect (see, among many others, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 131 and 160, ECHR 2000-XI, and Kormacheva v. Russia, no. 53084/99, §§ 57 and 64, 29 January 2004).

 
• EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 8065/08

  LIBERMAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Firstly, the Court has on numerous occasions determined issues analogous to those arising in the instant cases and ascertained in great detail the States" obligations under the Convention in that respect (see, among many others, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 131 and 160, ECHR 2000-XI, and Kormacheva v. Russia, no. 53084/99, §§ 57 and 64, 29 January 2004).
• EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 12375/05

  MAKSIMOV v. RUSSIA

  Firstly, the Court has on numerous occasions determined issues analogous to those arising in the instant cases and ascertained in great detail the States" obligations under the Convention in that respect (see, among many others, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 131 and 160, ECHR 2000-XI, Kormacheva v. Russia, no. 53084/99, §§ 57 and 64, 29 January 2004).
• EGMR, 29.04.2011 - 7142/05

  POBUDILINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Firstly, the Court has on numerous occasions determined issues analogous to those arising in the instant cases and ascertained in great detail the States" obligations under the Convention in that respect (see, among many others, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 131 and 160, ECHR 2000-XI, Kormacheva v. Russia, no. 53084/99, §§ 57 and 64, 29 January 2004).
• EGMR, 29.04.2004 - 14949/02

  PLAKSIN v. RUSSIA

  It notes that the Government did not indicate any remedy that could have expedited the determination of the applicant's case or provided him with adequate redress for delays that had already occurred (see Kormacheva v. Russia, no. 53084/99, 29 January 2004, § 64).
• EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 36932/05

  ZUYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Firstly, the Court has on numerous occasions determined issues analogous to those arising in the instant cases and ascertained in great detail the States" obligations under the Convention in that respect (see, among many others, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 131 and 160, ECHR 2000-XI; Kormacheva v. Russia, no. 53084/99, §§ 57 and 64, 29 January 2004).
• EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 4627/06

  GOLOSHCHAPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Firstly, the Court has on numerous occasions determined issues analogous to those arising in the instant cases and ascertained in great detail the States" obligations under the Convention in that respect (see, among many others, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 131 and 160, ECHR 2000-XI, and Kormacheva v. Russia, no. 53084/99, §§ 57 and 64, 29 January 2004).