Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.01.2004 - 57862/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,52744) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DAVENPORT v. PORTUGAL
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97
JECIUS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2004 - 57862/00
The Court reiterates that, where an applicant dies during the examination of a case, his heirs of next kin may in principle pursue the application on his behalf (Jecius v. Lithuania) no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX). - EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00
MIFSUD contre la FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2004 - 57862/00
In the Court's view, having regard to the "close affinity" between Article 13 and Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (ibid., § 152), the same is necessarily true of the concept of "effective" remedy within the meaning of the second provision (Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, ECHR 2002-VIII). - EGMR, 27.03.2003 - 58698/00
PAULINO TOMAS contre le PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2004 - 57862/00
The Court recalls in this connection that it has already examined whether an action to establish non-contractual liability on the part of the State is an effective remedy, within the meaning of Article 35 § 1, in respect of the excessive length of proceedings in the Paulino Tomás case (Paulino Tomás v. Portugal (dec.), no. 58698/00, ECHR 2003-VIII).
- EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 33099/08
KOZHOKAR v. RUSSIA
Further, having regard to the "close affinity" between Article 13 and Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, ECHR 2002-VIII, and Kudla, cited above, § 152), the notion of "effective" remedy has the same meaning in both provisions (see, mutatis mutandis, Davenport v. Portugal (dec.), no. 57862/00, 20 January 2000).