Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 5663/04   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2013,1249
EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 5663/04 (https://dejure.org/2013,1249)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29.01.2013 - 5663/04 (https://dejure.org/2013,1249)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29. Januar 2013 - 5663/04 (https://dejure.org/2013,1249)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,1249) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

  • EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

    PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 5663/04
    The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II, and Foley v. the United Kingdom, no. 39197/98, § 36, 22 October 2002).
  • EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 39197/98

    FOLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 5663/04
    The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II, and Foley v. the United Kingdom, no. 39197/98, § 36, 22 October 2002).
  • EGMR, 04.08.2005 - 77517/01

    STOIANOVA ET NEDELCU c. ROUMANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 5663/04
    The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Stoianova and Nedelcu v. Romania, nos. 77517/01 and 77722/01, § 26, ECHR 2005-VIII, and Soare v. Romania, no. 72439/01, § 29, 16 June 2009).
  • EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 12686/03

    Gorou ./. Griechenland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 5663/04
    The Court reiterates that Article 6 of the Convention applies to proceedings involving civil-party complaints from the moment the complainant is joined as a civil party, unless he or she has waived the right to reparation in an unequivocal manner (see Gorou v. Greece (no. 2) [GC], no. 12686/03, § 25, ECHR 2009-...).
  • EGMR, 16.06.2009 - 72439/01

    SOARE c. ROUMANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 5663/04
    The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Stoianova and Nedelcu v. Romania, nos. 77517/01 and 77722/01, § 26, ECHR 2005-VIII, and Soare v. Romania, no. 72439/01, § 29, 16 June 2009).
  • EGMR, 10.11.1969 - 1602/62

    Stögmüller ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 5663/04
    It also reiterates that one of the purposes of the right to trial within a reasonable period of time is to protect individuals from "remaining too long in a state of uncertainty about their fate" (see Stögmüller v Austria, 10 November 1969, Series A no. 9, p. 40, § 5).
  • EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 26083/94

    WAITE AND KENNEDY v. GERMANY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 5663/04
    The right of access to court in civil matters constitutes one aspect of the "right to a court" embodied in Article 6 § 1 (see, amongst many other authorities, Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, p. 2285, § 92; Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 50, ECHR 1999-I; and Golder, cited above, § 36).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 5663/04
    The Court reiterates that the object of the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies is to allow the national authorities (primarily the judicial authorities) to address allegations that a Convention right had been violated and, where appropriate, to afford redress before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, 28 April 2004, and Kudla v. Poland [GC] no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

    MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 5663/04
    The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness; it falls to the respondent State to establish that these various conditions are satisfied (see, inter alia, Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII, and Dalia v. France, no. 26102/95, § 38, ECHR 1998­I).
  • EGMR, 28.04.2004 - 56679/00

    AZINAS c. CHYPRE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 5663/04
    The Court reiterates that the object of the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies is to allow the national authorities (primarily the judicial authorities) to address allegations that a Convention right had been violated and, where appropriate, to afford redress before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, 28 April 2004, and Kudla v. Poland [GC] no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 64320/01
  • EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

    GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  • EGMR, 19.02.1998 - 26102/95

    DALIA v. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 41720/13

    NICOLAE VIRGILIU TANASE c. ROUMANIE

    63610/00 and 38692/05, § 91, 4 October 2007; Borobar and Others v. Romania, no. 5663/04, § 56, 29 January 2013; and Association of the Victims of S.C. Rompetrol S.A. and S.C. Geomin S.A. and Others v. Romania, no. 24133/03, § 65, 25 June 2013).
  • EGMR, 18.03.2021 - 24340/07

    PETRELLA c. ITALIE

    Il en est allé de même pour les affaires où le requérant avait déjà saisi, en parallèle, le juge civil et obtenu un examen sur le fond avant l'abandon des poursuites (S.O.S. racisme - Touche pas à mon pote c. Belgique (déc.) no 26341/11, §§ 30-34, 12 janvier 2016, et, mutatis mutandis, Borobar et autres c. Roumanie, no 5663/04, §§ 59-60, 29 janvier 2013).

    63610/00 and 38692/05, § 91, 4 October 2007; Borobar and Others v. Romania, no. 5663/04, § 56, 29 January 2013; and Association of the Victims of S.C. Rompetrol S.A. and S.C. Geomin S.A. [System] and Others v. Romania, no. 24133/03, § 65, 25 June 2013).".

  • EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 6319/21

    FABBRI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINO

    63610/00 and 38692/05, § 91, 4 October 2007; Borobar and Others v. Romania, no. 5663/04, § 56, 29 January 2013; and Association of the Victims of S.C. Rompetrol S.A. and S.C. Geomin S.A. and Others v. Romania, no. 24133/03, § 65, 25 June 2013).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht