Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 36925/07   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2019,989
EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 36925/07 (https://dejure.org/2019,989)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29.01.2019 - 36925/07 (https://dejure.org/2019,989)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29. Januar 2019 - 36925/07 (https://dejure.org/2019,989)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,989) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    GÜZELYURTLU AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS AND TURKEY

    Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (Cyprus);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    GÜZELYURTLU ET AUTRES c. CHYPRE ET TURQUIE

    Exception préliminaire rejetée (Article 35-3-a - Ratione loci);Non-violation de l'article 2 - Droit à la vie (Article 2-1 - Enquête effective) (Volet procédural) (Chypre);Violation de l'article 2 - Droit à la vie (Article 2-1 - Enquête effective) (Volet ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    GÜZELYURTLU AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS AND TURKEY - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

    [DEU] Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (Cyprus);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - ...

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (17)

  • EGMR, 21.11.2001 - 35763/97

    AL-ADSANI c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 36925/07
    When examining the merits of the complaint under Article 2, the Court noted that the death had taken place in Cyprus and that, as a rule, the obligation to ensure an effective investigation applied to Cyprus alone (ibid., § 243, referring mutatis mutandis to Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, § 38, ECHR 2001-XI, in relation to Article 3).

    See, inter alia, Golder, cited above, § 35, and Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, §§ 55-56, 21 November 2001, where the Court referred to this provision.

  • EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 36925/07
    The Turkish Government pointed out that the purpose of the procedural obligation to investigate under Article 2 was to secure "the effective implementation of the domestic laws safeguarding the right to life" (referring to Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 110, ECHR 2005-VII).

    43577/98 and 43579/98, § 160, ECHR 2005-VII).

  • EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

    McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 36925/07
    The requisite access of the public or the victim's relatives may, however, be provided for in other stages of the procedure (see, among other authorities, Giuliani and Gaggio, cited above, § 304; and McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 129, ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

    TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 36925/07
    It is not possible to reduce the variety of situations which might occur to a bare check-list of acts of investigation or other simplified criteria (see Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, §§ 101-110, ECHR 1999-IV; and Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 80, ECHR 2000-VI).
  • EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 43606/04

    YOTOVA c. BULGARIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 36925/07
    This obligation requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when there is reason to believe that an individual has sustained life-threatening injuries in suspicious circumstances, even where the presumed perpetrator of the fatal attack is not a State agent (see Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; Pereira Henriques v. Luxembourg, no. 60255/00, § 56, 9 May 2006; and Yotova v. Bulgaria, no. 43606/04, § 68, 23 October 2012).
  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 36925/07
    The investigation must be, inter alia, thorough, impartial and careful (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 161-163, Series A no. 324).
  • EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08

    ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 36925/07
    The Court notes, however, that the obligation to cooperate, which is incumbent on States under the procedural limb of Article 2, can only be an obligation of means, not one of result, in line with what the Court has established in respect of the obligation to investigate (see Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 233, 30 March 2016; Palic, cited above, § 65; and Aliyeva and Aliyev, cited above, § 70).
  • EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99

    MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 36925/07
    This obligation requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when there is reason to believe that an individual has sustained life-threatening injuries in suspicious circumstances, even where the presumed perpetrator of the fatal attack is not a State agent (see Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; Pereira Henriques v. Luxembourg, no. 60255/00, § 56, 9 May 2006; and Yotova v. Bulgaria, no. 43606/04, § 68, 23 October 2012).
  • EGMR, 31.03.2005 - 38187/97

    ADALI v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 36925/07
    In the vast majority of cases where the Court has had to rule on complaints under the procedural aspect of Article 2, the death had occurred within the jurisdiction of the Contracting State at issue, either within its national territory (see, among many other authorities, Rantsev in respect of Cyprus), in an area under the effective control of that State (see Adali v. Turkey, no. 38187/97, 31 March 2005), or on board craft and vessels registered in, or flying the flag of, that State (see Bakanova v. Lithuania, no. 11167/12, § 63, 31 May 2016).
  • EGMR, 15.04.2012 - 29520/09

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 36925/07
    55508/07 and 29520/09, § 132, ECHR 2013).
  • EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99

    Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere

  • EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 1398/03

    MARKOVIC ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  • EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 35587/08

    ALIYEVA AND ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 23.03.1995 - 15318/89

    LOIZIDOU c. TURQUIE (EXCEPTIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES)

  • EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 11138/10

    Transnistrien

  • EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 29750/09

    HASSAN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  • EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 11167/12

    BAKANOVA v. LITHUANIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht