Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AHMET TUNÇ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 4133/16
• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 4133/16, 31542/16

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 4133/16

  The Court refers in this connection to the principles set out in its case-law in respect of the substantive and procedural obligations under that Article (see, for instance, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 148-49, Series A no. 324; Isayeva and Others, cited above, §§ 168-200 and §§ 208-25; Erdogan and Others v. Turkey, no. 19807/92, §§ 65-95, 25 April 2006; Finogenov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18299/03 and 27311/03, §§ 206-82, ECHR 2011 (extracts); Gülbahar Özer and Others v. Turkey, no. 44125/06, §§ 58-76, 2 July 2013; Cangöz and Others v. Turkey, no. 7469/06, §§ 105-49, 26 April 2016; Döndü Günel v. Turkey, no. 34673/07, §§ 22-35, 6 September 2016; and Tagayeva and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 4133/16

  The Court reiterates that doubts as to the lack of independence and impartiality of investigatory authorities or courts may in certain circumstances raise an issue under Article 2 of the Convention (see, for instance, Ogur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 91, ECHR 1999-III, and Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014/05, §§ 169 and 177, 14 April 2015), but they cannot, in principle, be raised as a pre-emptive claim to escape the obligation to exhaust domestic remedies (see, mutatis mutandis, Mercan v. Turkey (dec.), no 56511/16, § 26, 8 November 2016).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 4133/16

  Referring to the Court's judgments in the cases of, inter alia, Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria (28 October 1998, § 102, Reports 1998-VIII) and Ilhan v. Turkey [GC] (no. 22277/93, §§ 60-64, ECHR 2000-VII), the applicants mainly argued that the Court had not regarded compensatory remedies as referred to by the Government as effective in similar cases raising issues under Article 2 of the Convention.

 
• EGMR, 25.04.2006 - 19807/92

  ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 4133/16

  The Court refers in this connection to the principles set out in its case-law in respect of the substantive and procedural obligations under that Article (see, for instance, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 148-49, Series A no. 324; Isayeva and Others, cited above, §§ 168-200 and §§ 208-25; Erdogan and Others v. Turkey, no. 19807/92, §§ 65-95, 25 April 2006; Finogenov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18299/03 and 27311/03, §§ 206-82, ECHR 2011 (extracts); Gülbahar Özer and Others v. Turkey, no. 44125/06, §§ 58-76, 2 July 2013; Cangöz and Others v. Turkey, no. 7469/06, §§ 105-49, 26 April 2016; Döndü Günel v. Turkey, no. 34673/07, §§ 22-35, 6 September 2016; and Tagayeva and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 18299/03

  Vorgehen bei Geiselnahme in Moskau verurteilt // Russland muss Hinterbliebene von …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 4133/16

  The Court refers in this connection to the principles set out in its case-law in respect of the substantive and procedural obligations under that Article (see, for instance, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 148-49, Series A no. 324; Isayeva and Others, cited above, §§ 168-200 and §§ 208-25; Erdogan and Others v. Turkey, no. 19807/92, §§ 65-95, 25 April 2006; Finogenov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18299/03 and 27311/03, §§ 206-82, ECHR 2011 (extracts); Gülbahar Özer and Others v. Turkey, no. 44125/06, §§ 58-76, 2 July 2013; Cangöz and Others v. Turkey, no. 7469/06, §§ 105-49, 26 April 2016; Döndü Günel v. Turkey, no. 34673/07, §§ 22-35, 6 September 2016; and Tagayeva and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99

  Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 4133/16

  46113/99 et al, § 69, ECHR 2010).
• EGMR, 03.07.2014 - 13255/07

  Georgien ./. Russland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 4133/16

  The rule is also inapplicable where an administrative practice consisting of a repetition of acts incompatible with the Convention and official tolerance by the State authorities has been shown to exist, and is of such a nature as to make proceedings futile or ineffective (see Akdivar and Others, cited above, § 67, and Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255/07, §§ 122-24, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 34673/07

  DÖNDÜ GÜNEL c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 4133/16

  The Court refers in this connection to the principles set out in its case-law in respect of the substantive and procedural obligations under that Article (see, for instance, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 148-49, Series A no. 324; Isayeva and Others, cited above, §§ 168-200 and §§ 208-25; Erdogan and Others v. Turkey, no. 19807/92, §§ 65-95, 25 April 2006; Finogenov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18299/03 and 27311/03, §§ 206-82, ECHR 2011 (extracts); Gülbahar Özer and Others v. Turkey, no. 44125/06, §§ 58-76, 2 July 2013; Cangöz and Others v. Turkey, no. 7469/06, §§ 105-49, 26 April 2016; Döndü Günel v. Turkey, no. 34673/07, §§ 22-35, 6 September 2016; and Tagayeva and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 56511/16

  Türken vor dem EGMR: Keine direkte Klage erlaubt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 4133/16

  The Court reiterates that doubts as to the lack of independence and impartiality of investigatory authorities or courts may in certain circumstances raise an issue under Article 2 of the Convention (see, for instance, Ogur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 91, ECHR 1999-III, and Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014/05, §§ 169 and 177, 14 April 2015), but they cannot, in principle, be raised as a pre-emptive claim to escape the obligation to exhaust domestic remedies (see, mutatis mutandis, Mercan v. Turkey (dec.), no 56511/16, § 26, 8 November 2016).