Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.02.2000 - 24209/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2000,37082) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 07.12.1994 - 24209/94
- EGMR, 29.02.2000 - 24209/94
- EGMR, 22.07.2003 - 24209/94
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65
RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.02.2000 - 24209/94
In this regard, the Court recalls that it can accept the fact that the last stage of domestic remedies may be reached after the lodging of the application but before it is called upon to state its opinion as to admissibility (Eur. Court H.R., Ringeisen v. Germany judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, p. 38, para. 91). - EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
TOMASI c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.02.2000 - 24209/94
The mere possibility that the injuries were sustained in a manner other than that alleged by the applicant is not sufficient reason for rejecting a complaint (cf. Tomasi v. France, Comm. Report 11.12.90, Eur. Court HR, Series A no. 241-A, p. 52, § 100). - EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89
KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.02.2000 - 24209/94
Cogent reasons are needed before the Court departs from the findings of the national courts (Klaas v. Germany judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, p. 17, § 30).