Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.03.2016 - 33200/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,5209) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OKOLISAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
OKOLISAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03
IDALOV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.03.2016 - 33200/11
As regards conditions of detention, the Court reiterates that the State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention (see Kudla, cited above, § 94; and Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 116, ECHR 2014 (extracts)) and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see see Kudla, cited above, § 94; and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 93, 22 May 2012). - EGMR - 43441/08 (anhängig)
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.03.2016 - 33200/11
As regards conditions of detention, the Court reiterates that the State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention (see Kudla, cited above, § 94; and Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 116, ECHR 2014 (extracts)) and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see see Kudla, cited above, § 94; and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 93, 22 May 2012).
- EGMR - 74514/11 (anhängig)
SISANOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Has there been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 3 (see Okolisan v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 33200/11, § 41, 29 March 2016)?.