Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.04.2008 - 3338/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,61356) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PROCEDO CAPITAL CORPORATION v. NORWAY
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 29.04.2008 - 3338/05
- EGMR, 24.09.2009 - 3338/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 23.06.1993 - 12952/87
RUIZ-MATEOS c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2008 - 3338/05
Nor is there anything to suggest that the applicant was not given the opportunity to have knowledge of and comment on the observations filed or evidence adduced by the other party (see Buchberger, cited above, ibidem; Ruiz Mateos v. Spain judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 262, p. 25, § 63; Nideröst-Huber v. Switzerland judgment of 18 February 1997, Reports 1997-I, p. 108, § 24; Beer v. Austria, no. 30428/96, § 17, 6.2.2001). - EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88
DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2008 - 3338/05
Against this background, there is nothing to indicate that the applicant company was not afforded a reasonable opportunity to present its case under conditions that did not place it at a disadvantage vis-à-vis Sundal Collier (see Buchberger v. Austria, no. 32899/96, § 50, 20 December 2001; Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1993, Series A no. 274, p. 19, § 33; Ankerl v. Switzerland judgment of 23 October 1996, Reports 1996-V, pp. 1567-68, § 38).