Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 20455/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,63532) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TUGARINOV v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 20455/04
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 20455/04
The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 21.11.2002 - 36747/02
ARSLAN contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 20455/04
Having regard to the fact that the final judgment in his case was issued on 18 November 2003, the Court considers that he raised his complaint of excessive length of the criminal proceedings within the six-month time-limit established by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Arslan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 36747/02, ECHR 2002-X (extracts), and Gaspari v. Slovenia, no. 21055/03, § 35, 21 July 2009). - EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80
DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 20455/04
Bearing in mind the prominent place which the right to a fair trial by an independent and impartial tribunal holds in a democratic society (see, inter alia, De Cubber v. Belgium, judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86, p. 16, § 30), the Court considers that the State should bear the responsibility for a delay incurred through a successful challenge of the trial bench by a party to the proceedings.
- EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 78042/16
X ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE
Au demeurant, le Gouvernement n'a pas démontré que cette instance était compétente pour offrir le redressement souhaité par les intéressés (Tugarinov c. Russie, no 20455/04, § 49, 29 avril 2010, et Chevkin c. Russie, no 4171/03, § 47, 15 juin 2006).