Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TSIRLIS ET KOULOUMPAS c. GRÈCE

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 5, Art. 9, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 41, Art. 14+9, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 5-1 Violation de l'art. 5-5 Non-violation de l'art. 3 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 9 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 14+9 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 6-1 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 13 Dommage matériel - réparation pécuniaire Préjudice moral - ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TSIRLIS AND KOULOUMPAS v. GREECE

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 5, Art. 9, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 41, Art. 14+9, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-1 Violation of Art. 5-5 No violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 9 Not necessary to examine Art. 14+9 Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - ...

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 04.09.1995 - 19233/91
• EGMR, 29.05.1997 - 19233/91, 19234/91, 54/1996/673/859, 54/1996/673/860

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 29.02.1988 - 9106/80

  BOUAMAR v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.1997 - 19233/91

  1 (art. 5-1) failure to comply with domestic law entails a breach of the Convention, it follows that the Court can and should exercise a certain power to review whether this law has been complied with (see the Bouamar v. Belgium judgment of 29 February 1988, Series A no. 129, p. 21, para. 49).
• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82

  BOZANO v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.1997 - 19233/91

  The Court reiterates that the Convention here essentially refers back to domestic law and states the obligation to conform to the substantive and procedural rules thereof; but it requires in addition that any deprivation of liberty should be consistent with the purpose of Article 5 (art. 5), namely to protect individuals from arbitrariness (see, among many other authorities, the Bozano v. France judgment of 18 December 1986, Series A no. 111, p. 23, para. 54, and the Lukanov v. Bulgaria judgment of 20 March 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II, pp. 543-44, para. 41).
• EGMR, 29.05.1997 - 21522/93

  GEORGIADIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.1997 - 19233/91

  7 and in the interests of the proper administration of justice, that a single Chamber should be constituted to consider this case and that of Georgiadis v. Greece (no. 56/1996/675/865).

• EGMR, 29.05.1997 - 19234/91
  19233/91 und Bsw.