Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  OGRAZDEN AD AND OTHERS v. \

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings Civil proceedings Enforcement proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  OGRAZDEN AD v. \

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [MKD] Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings Civil proceedings Enforcement proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) ...

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 35630/04

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 22014/04

  KAIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 35630/04

  It therefore cannot be regarded as adequate in the circumstances of the case (see the principles established under the Court's case-law in Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 65-107, ECHR 2006-V; see also Parlov-Tkalcic v. Croatia, no. 24810/06, § 62, 22 December 2009) and leads to the conclusion that the redress provided to them at domestic level was insufficient (see Kaic and Others v. Croatia, no. 22014/04, § 20, 17 July 2008).
• EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 24810/06

  PARLOV-TKALCIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 35630/04

  It therefore cannot be regarded as adequate in the circumstances of the case (see the principles established under the Court's case-law in Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 65-107, ECHR 2006-V; see also Parlov-Tkalcic v. Croatia, no. 24810/06, § 62, 22 December 2009) and leads to the conclusion that the redress provided to them at domestic level was insufficient (see Kaic and Others v. Croatia, no. 22014/04, § 20, 17 July 2008).

• EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 3129/04

  DIMITRIJOSKI v.

  It is so since only after the improvements noted in this case were made, was the Court able to regard the length remedy as effective (see Ograzden Ad and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, nos. 35630/04, 53442/07 and 42580/09, §§ 17 and 29, 29 May 2012).
• EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 50248/07

  TODOROVSKI v.

  The Court observes that the applicant's victim status depends on whether the redress afforded to the applicant by the Supreme Court was adequate and sufficient having regard to Article 41 of the Convention (see Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Arvanitaki-Roboti and Others v. Greece [GC], no. 27278/03, § 29, 15 February 2008; and Ograzden Ad and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, nos. 35630/04, 53442/07 and 42580/09, § 15, 29 May 2012).