Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 41716/08   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2012,15706
EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 41716/08 (https://dejure.org/2012,15706)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29.05.2012 - 41716/08 (https://dejure.org/2012,15706)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29. Mai 2012 - 41716/08 (https://dejure.org/2012,15706)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,15706) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges




Kontextvorschau:





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (30)  

  • EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 2430/06

    GANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    For that reason, the Court is unable to entertain the claims which the respondent Government raised for the first time in the proceedings before it (see, mutatis mutandis, Valeriy Kovalenko v. Russia, no. 41716/08, § 49, 29 May 2012; Aleksandr Makarov v. Russia, no. 15217/07, § 128, 12 March 2009; Megadat.com SRL v. Moldova, no. 21151/04, § 76, ECHR 2008; Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 102, 4 October 2005; and Nikolov v. Bulgaria, no. 38884/97, § 74, 30 January 2003).
  • EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 27236/05

    YEVDOKIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    A lack or deficiency of reasons in the domestic decisions cannot be supplemented ex post facto in the proceedings before the Court, for the Court cannot take the place of the national courts that considered the issue of the litigant's appearance before the court (see, mutatis mutandis, Valeriy Kovalenko v. Russia, no. 41716/08, § 49, 29 May 2012).
  • EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 9096/09

    ABASHEV CONTRE LA RUSSIE ET 122 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    41716/08.
  • EGMR, 08.02.2018 - 33566/11

    RAMKOVSKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

    Accordingly, the Government's new reasons, which were raised for the first time in the proceedings before the Court, will not be taken into account (see Valeriy Kovalenko v. Russia, no. 41716/08, § 49, 29 May 2012, with further references).
  • EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 56111/12

    ORBAN v. CROATIA

    Accordingly, the Government's reasons raised for the first time in the proceedings before the Court, cannot be taken into account (see, amongst many others, Valeriy Kovalenko v. Russia, no. 41716/08, § 49, 29 May 2012).
  • EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 8784/11

    SEJDIJI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

    As the Government submitted, other facts that could have supported the authorities" conclusion about the applicant's potential to abscond might have existed, however, they were not mentioned in the detention orders and it is not the Court's task to establish such facts and take the place of the national authorities who ruled on the issue of detention (see Yuriy Yakovlev v. Russia, no. 5453/08, § 73, 29 April 2010, and Valeriy Kovalenko v. Russia, no. 41716/08, § 49, 29 May 2012).
  • EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 50624/09

    KORNILOV v. RUSSIA

    As to the intended redress to be provided to the applicant, the Court is satisfied that the amount of compensation proposed is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases (see Yuriy Yakovlev v. Russia, no. 5453/08, § 95, 29 April 2010; Valeriy Kovalenko v. Russia, no. 41716/08, § 67, 29 May 2012; or Kislitsa v. Russia, no. 29985/05, § 49, 19 June 2012).
  • EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 10387/07

    ANTSIFEROV AND NOVIKOV v. RUSSIA

    As to the intended redress to be provided to the applicants, the Court is satisfied that the amount of compensation proposed is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases (see Yuriy Yakovlev v. Russia, no. 5453/08, § 95, 29 April 2010; Valeriy Kovalenko v. Russia, no. 41716/08, § 67, 29 May 2012; or Kislitsa v. Russia, no. 29985/05, § 49, 19 June 2012).
  • EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 24849/05

    SERGEY ZAYTSEV v. RUSSIA

    As to the intended redress to be provided to the applicant, the Court is satisfied that the amount of compensation proposed is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases (see Yuriy Yakovlev v. Russia, no. 5453/08, § 95, 29 April 2010; Valeriy Kovalenko v. Russia, no. 41716/08, § 67, 29 May 2012; and Kislitsa v. Russia, no. 29985/05, § 49, 19 June 2012).
  • EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 42618/07

    KLYACHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    The Court is satisfied that the proposed sums are not unreasonable in comparison with the awards made by the Court in similar cases (see Dolgova v. Russia, no. 11886/05, §§ 54-56, 2 March 2006; Shcheglyuk v. Russia, no. 7649/02, §§ 50-53, 14 December 2006; Yuriy Yakovlev v. Russia, no. 5453/08, §§ 93-95, 29 April 2010; Valeriy Kovalenko v. Russia, no. 41716/08, 29 May 2012; Kislitsa v. Russia, no. 29985/05, 19 June 2012; and, by contrast, Topcic-Rosenberg v. Croatia, no. 19391/11, § 29, 14 November 2013).
  • EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 48881/08

    BUSHMILEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 44098/10

    SHCHEGLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 16346/08

    VAVILIN AND AVOYAN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 27.09.2016 - 28342/10

    PUGIN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 27.09.2016 - 59989/11

    YEFIMENKO v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 13892/13

    KANEV AND BOCHEK v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 58968/09

    TEDORADZE v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 16209/10

    SOKOLOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 23748/11

    MELIKOV AND SARKISYAN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 46958/12

    PUTENEV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 36221/09

    NOVIKOV AND MALEYEV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 55062/10

    KISELENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 23751/06

    KLIMENTYEV AND NADTOCHIYEV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 59813/09

    LAZAREV AND BEKTASHYANTS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 52122/10

    URAKOV AND MENSHCHIKOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 08.09.2015 - 54303/07

    ROGOZHNIKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 11588/05

    PLATONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 17.06.2014 - 28011/06

    TARKHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 17.06.2014 - 20609/09

    MERLO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 48790/07

    MAMEDOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht