Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  M.T. AND S.T. v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8+1, Art. 13, Art. 13+1, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96

  Schießbefehl

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 59968/09

  In particular, it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, § 45, Series A no. 140, and Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], no. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 49, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 04.01.2007 - 18727/06

  SZULA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 59968/09

  Furthermore, the Court reiterates that the right to institute criminal proceedings and to secure the conviction of a third party as such is not a right which is included among the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention (see Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004-I, with further references, and LiÄ£eres v. Latvia, no. 17/02, § 57, 28 June 2011) and that there is no absolute right to obtain the prosecution or conviction of any particular person (see Szula v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 18727/06, 4 January 2007).
• EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

  Opuz ./. Türkei

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 59968/09

  For a summary of relevant international material see the Court's judgment in Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, §§ 72-86, ECHR 2009..., in particular the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe's Recommendation Rec(2002)5 of 30 April 2002 on the protection of women against violence.
• EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 17/02

  LIGERES v. LATVIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 59968/09

  Furthermore, the Court reiterates that the right to institute criminal proceedings and to secure the conviction of a third party as such is not a right which is included among the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention (see Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004-I, with further references, and LiÄ£eres v. Latvia, no. 17/02, § 57, 28 June 2011) and that there is no absolute right to obtain the prosecution or conviction of any particular person (see Szula v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 18727/06, 4 January 2007).
• EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

  SCHENK c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 59968/09

  In particular, it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, § 45, Series A no. 140, and Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], no. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 49, ECHR 2001-II).

• EGMR, 20.12.2022 - 31012/19

  BAKOYANNI v. GREECE

  The Court recalls that the Convention does not guarantee the right to institute criminal proceedings or secure the conviction of a third party (Irene Wilson v. The United Kingdom (dec.), no. 10601/09, § 29, 23 October 2012, and M.T. and S.T. v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 59968/09, § 83, 29 May 2012, with further references therein).