Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GÜLBAHAR ÖZER AND YUSUF ÖZER v. TURKEY

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GÜLBAHAR ÖZER AND YUSUF ÖZER v. TURKEY - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 06.06.2013 - 38450/05

  SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.2018 - 64406/09

  The Court has already held that the concepts of "private life" and "family life" encompass the right to bury a close relative and to be present when that burial takes place (see, in particular, Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450/05, §§ 117-123, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Maskhadova and Others v. Russia, no. 18071/05, §§ 208-212, 6 June 2013 and the cases cited therein; see also, mutatis mutandis, Maric v. Croatia, no. 50132/12, §§ 59-60, 12 June 2014 and the cases cited therein).

  The majority state that, "for a measure to be regarded as both proportionate and necessary in a democratic society, there must be no possibility of recourse to an alternative measure that would cause less damage to the fundamental right at issue whilst fulfilling the same aim" (see paragraph 29 of the judgment, referring to Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450/05, §§ 131-134, ECHR 2013 (extracts); emphasis added).

• EGMR, 04.12.2015 - 47143/06

  EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen geheimer Telefonüberwachung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.2018 - 64406/09

  As the Court held in Roman Zakharov: "[The Court] must ascertain whether the interference] meets the requirement of "necessity in a democratic society", as provided by Article 8 § 2 of the Convention, including whether it is proportionate to the legitimate aims pursued, by verifying, for example whether it is possible to achieve the aims by less restrictive means" (Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, § 260, ECHR 2015; emphasis added).
• EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

  HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.2018 - 64406/09

  However, this case-law is difficult to reconcile with the long-standing principle that the adjective "necessary", within the meaning of Article 8 § 2 (and similar Articles), is not synonymous with "indispensable" (compare with the expressions "absolutely necessary" (Article 2 § 2), "strictly necessary" (Article 6 § 1), and "to the extent strictly required by the exigencies of the situation" (Article 15 § 1)) (Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 48, Series A no. 24).
• EGMR, 22.04.2013 - 48876/08

  Verbot politischer Fernsehwerbung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.2018 - 64406/09

  Rather the core issue is whether, in adopting the measure under review, the competent authority acted within the margin of appreciation afforded to it (see, albeit with respect to interferences that were the direct result of a legislative act or a general regulation, Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, § 110, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Garib v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 43494/09, § 157, ECHR 2017).
• EGMR, 06.06.2013 - 18071/05

  MASKHADOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.05.2018 - 64406/09

  The Court has already held that the concepts of "private life" and "family life" encompass the right to bury a close relative and to be present when that burial takes place (see, in particular, Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450/05, §§ 117-123, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Maskhadova and Others v. Russia, no. 18071/05, §§ 208-212, 6 June 2013 and the cases cited therein; see also, mutatis mutandis, Maric v. Croatia, no. 50132/12, §§ 59-60, 12 June 2014 and the cases cited therein).

• EGMR, 20.07.2021 - 12886/16

  POLAT v. AUSTRIA

  The Court has held that the concepts of "private life" and "family life" encompass the right to bury a close relative and to be present when that burial takes place (see Gülbahar Özer and Yusuf Özer v. Turkey (no. 64406/09, § 26, 29 May 2018, with further references).