Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 38550/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,51071) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
POCUCA v. CROATIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 (length) Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 38550/02
- EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 38550/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 38550/02
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 01.03.2002 - 48778/99
KUTIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 38550/02
The Court reiterates that a situation where a significant number of claims for large sums of money are lodged against a State may call for some further regulation by the State and that in this respect the States enjoy a certain margin of appreciation (see, mutatis mutandis, Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 31, ECHR 2002-II). - EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 50389/99
DORAN v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 38550/02
The Court also notes that a remedy for the length of proceedings still pending can only be considered effective if particular attention is paid to the speediness of the remedial action itself since the adequate nature of a remedy can be undermined by its excessive duration (see Doran v. Ireland, no. 50389/99, § 57, ECHR 2003-X (extracts); and, mutatis mutandis, Erdös v. Hungary (dec.), no. 38937/97, 3 May 2001). - EGMR, 18.09.2003 - 63779/00
BARBACA v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 38550/02
However, in the light of the subsequent practice of the Constitutional Court (see paragraph 27 above), it finds it necessary to review that case-law in respect of administrative proceedings (see Jeftic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 57576/00, 3 October 2002, and Barbaca v. Croatia (dec.), no. 63779/00, 18 September 2003). - EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 20862/02
SLAVICEK contre la CROATIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 38550/02
The Court recalls that it recognised a constitutional complaint under section 63 of the Constitutional Court Act as an effective remedy for the length of proceedings still pending in Croatia (see Slavicek v. Croatia (dec.), no. 20862/02, ECHR 2002-VII).