Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MATHEW c. PAYS-BAS

  Art. 3, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation partielle de l'art. 3 Non-violation partielle de l'art. 3 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MATHEW v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Art. 3, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 (certain aspects) No violation of Art. 3 (other aspects) Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 24919/03
• EGMR, 07.06.2016 - 24919/03

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 24919/03

  The Court is also attentive to the seriousness that attaches to a ruling that a Contracting State has violated fundamental rights (see, as a recent authority, Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 147, ECHR 2005-VII).
• EGMR, 28.09.2000 - 25498/94

  MESSINA c. ITALIE (N° 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 24919/03

  They compared the present case to that of Messina v. Italy (no. 2) ((dec.), no. 25498/94, ECHR 1999-V), in which a regime keeping a particular prisoner separate from his fellow inmates, which had been instituted for security reasons and had lasted longer than the detention complained of by the applicant in the instant case, had been held by the Court to be within acceptable limits.
• EGMR, 03.04.2001 - 27229/95

  KEENAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 24919/03

  In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 (see Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, § 38, and Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 113, ECHR 2001-III).

 
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 38812/97

  POLTORATSKIY v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 24919/03

  The Court has had occasion to find Article 3 violated by the poor state of repair of a cell in which a prisoner was held for long periods and by the lack of opportunity for outdoor exercise (see Poltoratskiy v. Ukraine, no. 38812/97, § 146, ECHR 2003-V).
• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 24919/03

  The Court accepts that a reduction of a prison sentence commensurate with the harm complained of may constitute "compensation" in this sense (see Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 31, § 67).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 24919/03

  In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 (see Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, § 38, and Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 113, ECHR 2001-III).