Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PERVUSHIN AND OTHERS v. ESTONIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 MRK
  Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 54091/08
• EGMR, 02.03.2010 - 54091/08

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96

  GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 54091/08

  The Court, relying on its constant case-law (see, among other authorities, García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I, considers that the judgments of the County Court and the Court of Appeal were sufficiently reasoned.
• EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96

  Schießbefehl

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 54091/08

  Lastly, it is primarily for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law (see Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 49, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

  EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 54091/08

  The Court's role is confined to ascertaining whether the proceedings considered as a whole were fair (see, mutatis mutandis, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 34, Series A no. 247-B).

 
• EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 11454/85

  KOSTOVSKI v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 54091/08

  With this in mind, an applicant should not be prevented from testing the anonymous witness's reliability (see Kostovski v. the Netherlands, 20 November 1989, § 42, Series A no. 166).
• EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86

  LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 54091/08

  There are exceptions to this principle, but they must not infringe the rights of the defence; as a general rule, paragraphs 1 and 3 (d) of Article 6 require that the defendant be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him, either when he makes his statements or at a later stage (see Lüdi v. Switzerland, 15 June 1992, § 49, Series A no. 238).
• EGMR, 26.07.2002 - 32911/96

  MEFTAH AND OTHERS v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 54091/08

  The Court notes at the outset that, since the guarantees of paragraph 3 (d) of Article 6 are specific aspects of the right to a fair trial set forth in paragraph 1 of this Article, it will consider the complaint that there was no opportunity to examine the witnesses at issue under the two provisions taken together (see Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96, 35237/97 and 34595/97, § 40, ECHR 2002-VII).